User talk:Caveat

W e l c o m e !
Hi there, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm a regular contributor here, and when I notice on the recent changes  log that a new editor has registered, I like to send them a welcome message - that's how I ended up on your talk page.

If you've never edited here before, there are a few useful links that you might want to look at, designed to help newcomers learn the ropes:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Here are a few features of Wikipedia that I find particularly helpful:
 * If you leave a message on a talk page, you can sign it with four tildes (~), which will automatically produce your name and a date stamp when you save the page.
 * The "Show preview" button allows you see what your post will look like before you save it - that way, you can proofread what you've written and not have to go back and correct spelling mistakes, failed links, etc.
 * You can create a watchlist for yourself that will keep a record of any changes made to a page that interests you.

There are plenty of other features and facets of Wikipedia, many of which I probably haven't even discovered myself, so have fun looking around and finding them.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions , ask me on my  talk page , or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! - Tapir Terrific, 15:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Justice
Hi - I notice you added a couple of articles to the bibliography of this article. I've cut them for the moment, and put an explanation on the article's talk page, but I'm happy to be shown how I'm wrong, if you'd like to discuss the issue there. Cheers, Sam Clark 16:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello again - I'm sorry, I'm going to seem like I'm picking on you: I've cut the short addition you made to the retributivism section, for similar reasons as those for cutting your bibliographic additions. Justice is a 'high level', general introduction to the subject, and I think it would be a mistake to let it gather more and more specific points and positions. The libertarian approach to retributive justice is certainly of interest, but if we include it here, we ought also to include a range of other specific positions, which would make the article unwieldy. Why not add a rather more detailed account to Retributive justice and/or Libertarianism? Actually, the former could use a general going over by someone with some knowledge of the subject: it's a mess at the moment. Again, happy to discuss all of this either at the article's talk page or at my talk page. Cheers Sam Clark 10:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)