User talk:Caviarsteel

Image copyright problem with Image:Dklsgjdlkgjsdklfgjls.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Dklsgjdlkgjsdklfgjls.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Z enlax T C S 21:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dgggggg.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Dgggggg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. do not remove speedy delete tags from articles guyzero | talk 02:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Karl craton
A tag has been placed on Karl craton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. guyzero | talk 02:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. guyzero | talk 16:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Information without sources
This is getting disruptive. Please do not add any more unreferenced material to the La Plata HS page. David D. (Talk) 19:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. guyzero | talk 19:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

You should stop vandalizing LPHS's page and leave the facts to people who really know what is going on Caviarsteel (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

How about you stop beating up on my and let me use my free speach. I know the facts you dont so leave well enough alone. Caviarsteel (talk) 19:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia may be publicly editable, but it is privately run. There is no right to free speech here. --Onorem♠Dil 19:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 19:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)