User talk:Cavie78/Archive 5

Alphabetization and collation
I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. -- Wavelength (talk) 15:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

The Return of Dr. Octagon
Hi, there. I cleaned up the article based upon your notes. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC))
 * I clarified the remaining issues you've brought up. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC))

Re The Return of Dr. Octagon GA
Hi Cavie78, I have replied on my talk page, but basically I agree with you. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 17:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have replied to your comments. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC))

A request
Hi there. Since you did such a good job with The Return of Dr. Octagon, would you be interested in taking a look at Ralph Bakshi and reviewing its featured article candidacy? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC))
 * I'm not around much for the next few days but I'll check in on Monday if the review is still active.Cavie78 (talk) 14:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

GAN review of Guitar Solos
Hi, thank you for your review of this article and for your compliments. I've attended to your suggestions, which I've marked up at Talk:Guitar Solos/GA1, so when you get a moment if you could have another look at it please. Thanks. --Bruce1eetalk 09:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Cavie78. I appreciate your time. --Bruce1eetalk 13:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Guitar Solos has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. —Zeagler (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Modern Life Is Rubbish
Thanks for watching out for the article, Cavie. I reverted it back to the way it was since I don't think the IP actually has a clue regarding NPOV and sources etc. Thanks again! indopug (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

"Hello Sunshine"
Hey there Cavie78, I've reviewed Hello Sunshine and have left some comments on the review page. Hope to see these improvements. Diverse Mentality  19:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks DiverseMentality, have left comments on the review page. Cavie78 (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

GAN Love Kraft
I have fixed some date inconsistencies, note at Talk:Love Kraft Jezhotwells (talk) 17:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, something went wrong with my saving the review, but ok now. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

SFA
I might have some Super Furry Animals album reviews lying about, but I have to check. I definitely have a Mojo review for Gruff Rhys' Candylion, but that's not quite the same thing. WesleyDodds (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Excellent stuff! I've got Q covered but anything from Uncut, Mojo etc. would be helpful. I badly need some interviews from 1995-2004 as well - not a lot on the net. Cavie78 (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for March 2009
SoxBot II (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Phantom Phorce
I have passed the article, view the talkpage for details. Congratulations, and have a great day! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for April 2009
SoxBot (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Phantom Power
You have a lot of citations in the lead section. That information only needs to be cited in the article body. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for May 2009
SoxBot (talk) 10:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Cite order
Smack Bot, as part of WP:AWB general fixes, will indeed reorder cites numerically. Rich Farmbrough, 21:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Nguyễn-Vỏ Nghiêm-Minh
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nguyễn-Vỏ Nghiêm-Minh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * IMDB does not confer inherent notability, otherwise non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  MBisanz  talk 06:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)