User talk:Cawhite88/sandbox

ccg246's Peer Review
Hey, just reviewed your Sandbox draft on Chemical mimicry. You chose a huge topic, so for that, I commend you. Some suggestions for you to ponder:
 * watch your formatting: "This is[ ]by adapting to produce chemicals" (two spaces here), "research and literature. [1]." (double period), "varied success. [1]The pheromones are" (no space here in between reference and next sentence), "the moths capture were in fact male" (captured), "would be cuckoo bees" (capitalize Cuckoo), "“defense signals’" (" followed by ', needs to be the same),
 * add links to other wiki pages for the following: "Chemical mimicry exists within many of the different forms of mimicry such as aggressive, protective, Batesian, and Müllerian mimicry", "Chemical mimicry of an organism’s pheromones", and all of the examples you used
 * what senses? source?: "can involve a number of different senses"
 * "organisms that have the potential to be prey": sentence is a bit convoluted, just say "potential prey organisms", or "potential prey"
 * number 8 in your reference list is also number 3
 * no dead links in your reference list, but there are 4 error codes in there that should be fixed: "Check date values in: |date= (help)"
 * overall, your topic seemed more of a physiological response topic than a behavioural topic, so I would try to relate it back to behaviour

Ccg246 (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)