User talk:Cayla.campPR

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Cayla.campPR. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Petal, Mississippi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Cayla.campPR. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cayla.campPR. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I put the WP:PAID statement on your User page. Otherwise you were at risk of being blocked for being an undeclared paid editor. David notMD (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. I honestly have no clue what I am doing here - just trying my best to learn and I don't want to appear as though I am being defiant at all because I am not trying to be. Just trying to solve a few problems and correct information, that is all. Cayla.campPR (talk) 05:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * At Teahouse, you have been stubborn about not recognizing that Wikipedia has no influence on what is displayed at Google. Just to bring some closure, please acknowledge that at the Teahouse discussion.
 * Going forward - mandatory - that as a paid editor, you cease all direct editing of the article (same would apply to your husband because of his conflict-of-interest, i.e., married to you). Instead, you are limited to posting edit requests on the Talk page of the article, so that non-involved editors can enact your requests or not. This will take time (weeks), as the cadre of volunteers who evaluate edit requests cannot quite keep up with demand. David notMD (talk) 12:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)