User talk:Cbagdatli

Welcome!
Hello, Cbagdatli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Edit warring
You are engaged in an edit war on Bioresonance therapy. You made an edit. Super! Your edit was reverted. Bummer! Your next move, according to Wikipedia's BRD policy, is to discuss the change. Bring the matter up on Talk:Bioresonance therapy and reach a consensus with the editor(s) who disagree with your changes. This is how Wikipedia works. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I have begun the discussion of this topic at Talk:Bioresonance therapy. Please feel free to join in!  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your edits at Bioresonance therapy
Hello, Cbagdatli, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn talk 21:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)