User talk:Cbates875

December 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Photo manipulation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Everedux  (talk)  22:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Herbalife Nutrition. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  22:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Skin Cancer Foundation, you may be blocked from editing.  Everedux  (talk)  22:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Photo manipulation.  Everedux  (talk)  22:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding below. the wub "?!"  00:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

I am requesting an unblock please. I know the proper way to do Wikipedia editing after reading through the guidelines. It won't happen again. You have my word.

Please unblock me- I will NOT post spam links again and do it the correct way
I know what the process is and I promise I will do it the right way. I have posted the appeal on my talk page. Please unblock me. I agree not to add those spam links again.

The edits I would make to fix the dead links is find the original content from the dead links, put the content on my website, and change some parts of it to where it is syndicated content relevant to the Wikipedia post. I will NOT add those spam links again and will do the correct way. I can prove it to you. PLEASE unblock me.

I know what the process is and I promise I will do it the right way. I have posted the appeal on my talk page. Please unblock me. I agree not to add those spam links again. The edits I would make to fix the dead links is find the original content from the dead links, put the content on my website, and change some parts of it to where it is syndicated content relevant to the Wikipedia post. I will NOT add those spam links again and will do the correct way. I can prove it to you. PLEASE unblock me.


 * What you are suggesting would still be considered spam, and since Wikipedia has the "nofollow" attribute on all external links it won't even help boost your site's search rankings. If you really want to rescue dead links, you should use a reputable service like the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine as described at Link rot. the wub "?!"  17:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

I would like to be unblocked please. They will be no-follow links.

Can I prove it to you?

I don't agree with the decision. It isn't further spamming. I will build up reputable links that are relevant to the content. I will find a syndicated version of the broken link and replace it so it's not broken anymore.

I can prove this to you.
 * We don't want you to prove this to us. We won't unblock you to link to your website, particularly if that website steals content in violation of copyright, from other sources. You are free to disagree with the decision but it's frankly not relevant. You won't be unblocked to do this, you'd be placing the entire Wikipedia project in jeopardy. --Yamla (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Cbates875. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)