User talk:Cbliege

Welcome!

Hello, Cbliege, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Material overindulgence, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gaijin42 (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Material overindulgence


A tag has been placed on Material overindulgence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Material overindulgence
- SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Material overindulgence


A tag has been placed on Material overindulgence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Cbliege, the article was indeed deleted as a copyvio (not G4; the above nomination was incorrect), and it is about to be deleted again. There is no evidence to suggest that you have clearance, and from which authors? You cite a bunch of them, though you cite them incorrectly: material from this book is attributed to this source--but it cites the unattributed book verbatim ("when we refer to a child as spoiled"). That cannot be. I am going to salt the article to prevent recreation without more oversight: an article can be written with permission, so to speak, which you might could gain through Articles for creation, or through a friendly admin (not me: this is not my field or interest). Please do not commit any more copyright violations. If you do not understand how you fell foul of those guidelines, study them; more violations might result in a warning and/or a block--we cannot have copyvios in our project. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I see now that according to the talk page you sent a request to OTRS, which I don't have access to--but that still doesn't jive with the attribution in the article. If the copyright clearance is for the book source (rather than for the article), it can be restored, but it will need proper attribution. I saw that Gaijin responded on the talk page and mentioned "public release" etc; I do not believe this to be accurate, and their comments on notability didn't make much sense to me: lack of notability is NOT the reason your article got deleted. What I suggest you do, if you want to give it another shot, is to try it in a sandbox (WP:SANDBOX), making sure it meets our guidelines and conventions, with the proper citations etc, and with a clear understanding of what constitutes plagiarism (for instance, quotation marks need to be used properly). Then, ask an expert, such as User:Moonriddengirl, to see if it's OK; she knows copyright and is an administrator. Good luck, again, Drmies (talk) 17:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)