User talk:Cbmanning19

One team one dream
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of One team one dream, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 15:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Onteamcover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Onteamcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of One team one dream
A tag has been placed on One team one dream, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dchall1 22:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of One Team, One Dream
A tag has been placed on One Team, One Dream requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Matt  (  Talk  )   02:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.  Matt  (  Talk  )   08:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove AfD tags as you did at One Team, One Dream. Once the AfD discussion is over, the person who closes the discussion will remove it. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, no worries. You accidentally removed it during this edit. Best wishes to you, and I hope you continue to contribute here. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. I highly recommend that you have the article looked upon by others for copyediting and form so as to avoid such conflict of interest issues. MuZemike  ( talk ) 07:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

A note of welcome
The warnings and automated messages you've been recieving are part of an effort to keep Wikipedia "clean" and accurate. There are a limited number of editors here dealing with a large volume of submissions and edits, so people here have developed guidelines and automated responses to address issues that commonly arise. These are guidelines supporting the goal of the best most comprehensive encyclopedia. So, as I understand it, you are welcome (and even encouraged) to clean up the article you've created, as long as you avoid hyping or promoting something in which you have an interest. Try to make the article as encyclopedic and neutral as possible. Does that make sense? If you have any questions you can post them here or at the article's deletion discussion. Take care and don't get discouraged. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * This is my suggestion for how to rewrite the article a bit: Discuss what the reviews and media coverage said about the author and the book in the article. If it's a notable subject that needs to be demonstrated by encyclopedic writing about the subject as it's been discussed by established media. Why did they write about the book? Why is it important? But you have to demonstrate its importance without saying "this important book" or hyping it. But I think saying something along the lines of "The Roanoke Times discussed X,Y,Z regarding the book" might be okay. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The other thing to remember is to cite the content you add. If you enter wp: citations in the search box that should explain how to do them. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:One Team, One dream
Hi, articles cannot be deleted just by blanking the page. Only administrators have the option to delete articles. Let the AfD discussion close, if the result comes out to be "delete", an admin will delete the article. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

One Team, One Dream
Hopefully you will find the block of links above as useful as I do. Please take a look at the edits I made to the article. I am sure they are in no way perfect, but I hope it helps. All the best, especially good luck with your book. :) sinneed (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Please let me encourage you to put an edit summary on each of your edits. It is a great habit to get into... and while an edit may be obvious to you, it may well be less so to others. :) sinneed (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * From what I've read, being part of a championship winning team and writing about the journey have been exceptional experiences. Congratulations on those accomplishments, and best of luck with all your endeavors. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * AND now for my apology. I put a comment into the article.  And I broke your article when I did.  I have fixed it, and I am very sorry.  Made some wording changes to take out a bit of the "excited" language.  Please give it a look.  On your sources, I fear that as I see them, they are covering the author, not so much the content.  These may be interesting, but they won't address notability, I fear (not an expert there, sorry).  All the best, and again, please accept my apology for my ooopssss.  sinneed (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Oneteamonedream.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Oneteamonedream.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 10:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Team, One Dream


The article One Team, One Dream has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Absolutely no evidence of any notability that this self-published book to meet WP:NBOOKS, WP:COI to boot

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 02:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One Team, One Dream


A tag has been placed on One Team, One Dream, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Secret account 02:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)