User talk:Cbot95

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Scott (priest)


A tag has been placed on Peter Scott (priest) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 00:28, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Your recent edit to the page Millard Fillmore appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Napoleon, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 19:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sun News Network, you may be blocked from editing. єmarsee •  Speak up!  19:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2003 Detroit Tigers season, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Joja lozzo  19:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Reconstruction Era of the United States ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Joja lozzo  19:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Urology, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Urology was changed by Cbot95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967421 on 2011-08-10T00:15:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Paul Martin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. RandomAct(talk to me) 00:18, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jean Chrétien, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jean Chrétien was changed by Cbot95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941408 on 2011-08-10T00:21:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)