User talk:Cccm130/Nancy Utley/Bibliography

Subject Notability (why Nancy Utley deserves an article)
In terms of Wikipedia’s most basic, general requirement for notability (3 reliable, verifiable sources independent of the subject), the amount of these types of sources I have found definitely show that Nancy Utley as a subject is notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. When looking at Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for creative professionals—specifically the guideline that “the person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series)”—Utley’s body of work definitely qualifies as significant, and thus Utley, as a person who has created/co-created said work, is a notable enough figure.

Another important aspect of Utley’s career that qualifies her notability is the amount of awards and accolades she has received from significant institutions such as The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, Northwestern University (Medill), and Chi Omega, among others. One can also look at the amount of awards the work she helped produce has received to see that the work Utley has produced is culturally significant according to lasting and authoritative institutions such as the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences.

All of the evidence of Utley’s significant contribution to American film is verifiable as it is either coming directly from the awarding body or is noted across various reliable sources. Thus, there is a large amount of sources proving Utley’s notability and justifying the creation of a biographical Wikipedia article about her. Cccm130 (talk) 14:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)