User talk:Ccctttttt

Requests for bot and articles of deletion notice removal & request for page semi-protection
Hi, I am writing to request your attention regarding Lu Jun Hong's wikipedia page. This page is currently under discussion (articles of deletion). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jun_Hong_Lu_(2nd_nomination). However, there are some editing changes (vandalism) on Lu Jun Hong's page by a bot user on the last day of discussion (today). This behaviour is rather suspicious and the contents are based on unreliable sources (forum or personal's blog) in order to discredit Jun Hong Lu 's reputation despite how many awards he has been honoured. The sources added by the bot user have no reliable evidence to support the editing purposes and not related to media/news. I'm hoping you could assist on this matter (bot removal & request for semi-protection). On the other hand, please help by keeping the page and closing the discussion of articles for deletion regarding Lu Jun Hong (2nd nomination) on the last day of discussion given that there are numerous reliable sources (media etc.) displayed on the discussion page.Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuuu10 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely sure what you mean but you are not allowed to remove articles for deletion templates until discussion is closed. Sro23 (talk) 10:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I understand that. I am hoping he could close the case when the discussion ends. Reliable sources will be added if the page sustains.

I have to be honest that I only realised the page is under discussion for deletion only after I added. Even when I edited the article, I did not know that adding any information is not allowed. By the way, the pages are all government news press releases and not personal blogs or forum. If you have any issues about how the page appears, perhaps you should feedback to the government of China on how they should improve on their pages.

July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jun Hong Lu. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)