User talk:Ccdl

Welcome!
Hi Ccdl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Thanks for contributing to the article Flowers in Fog ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru  (talk)  12:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Part of this topic is related to 14 February 2022 and Deng_Lun

 * 1) I don't care if you are a fan or not.Please don't use too much news just to prove the same thing, and wikipedia.org is not a collection box for news reports.
 * 2) I found that there are many one-off accounts in Deng_Lun.If you find any WP:SOCK, please report.
 * 3) If you can, please don't add too many unimportant details, especially if you use unreliable sources (including no source). Rastinition (talk) 07:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

The part (14 Feb 2022) has been resolved. Noted to the others of what has been said.

Do not break my sign and do not try to change those words that have already been signed. Rastinition (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User talk:Ccdl, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. Rastinition (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Jonaxx in 2020.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Jonaxx in 2020.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jonaxx in 2020.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Jonaxx in 2020.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=230408888444229&set=ecnf.100044253585205. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Send help ASAP
Can someone out here tell me what to do on how to get rid of this "136.158.31.123" user. This was me, I tried downloading the wikipedia app and experimented there and I did not notice I was not logged in when I made that one edit. Thanks to those who will help me.

Ccdl (talk) 18:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Night Wanderer


A tag has been placed on Night Wanderer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://chinesedrama.org/night-wanderer-2022/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Slywriter (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Will edit those out immediately. Thanks for the information. Ccdl (talk) Ccdl (talk) 23:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Night Wanderer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night Wanderer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Night Wanderer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Atsme 💬 📧 02:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Night Wanderer
Hi Ccdl. I noticed that you created Night Wanderer but have not participated in Articles for deletion/Night Wanderer yet. Is this because you think article creators are not allowed to participate in deletion discussions (a misconception I've seen from new users in the past)?

Editors are allowed to participate in deletion discussions of articles they created. I encourage you to participate in the AfD discussion to share your rationale about why Night Wanderer passes Notability. The talk page note from the AfD nominator says, "anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion". Thank you, Cunard (talk) 10:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Lee Jae-wook, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  14:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Paper9oll i have read the discussion and it did not reach agreements. The examples shown above also have still fan meetings in their sections. Ccdl (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Jae-wook. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  14:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * @Paper9oll how did it became disruptive editing? and the examples shown above in the discussion still appears till today the fanmeeting section? so I think they should be deleted too? Ccdl (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ccdl You WP:IDHT so it became disruptive editing. And in case if you didn't read it correctly, the answer given by Explict and Alex answered that. And yes, they should be deleted as well.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  14:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Paper9oll but I read the discussion and it seems to appear that there is no definite agreement reached in whether deleting the fanmeeting section or not. Ccdl (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ccdl As I have mentioned earlier if you read the replies given by Alex and Explict, you would have found the answer, in short, it shouldn't be included unless it's notable events otherwise it's simply WP:ROUTINE. No one bothered to reply to the OP because the discussion was archived, and prior to automated archiving OP didn't ping anyone, lastly OP also didn't understand the discussion as seen in their earlier reply which Alex have to correct them on hence my assumption for OP replying the last reply is because OP didn't understand the replies given by Alex and Explict.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  14:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Paper9oll so I think you should delete too the examples (artists) shown in the discussion with the "fanmeeting" section. Ccdl (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Paper9oll you cited examples in your post if my memory serves me right. How about you go back and delete the fanmeeting sections of those you mentioned in your earlier post because I checked that their fanmeeting section is still available till today. The rule should be applied to all. Ccdl (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ccdl Not sure why you even ping me twice for same queries, if you're in a rush then you're free to go ahead to remove it, otherwise you can wait for it. I'm a person and volunteer not a robot.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  15:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Paper9oll I did not mean to send the same queries. I just want to say it in complete words so that you can get my point that the rule must be applied to all. That's all. Ccdl (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)