User talk:Ccharters

Welcome!
Hello, Ccharters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Darth Sitges (talk) 12:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

October & November 2012
Hello, I'm Darth Sitges. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sazerac Company without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darth Sitges (talk) 12:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello. Your repeated unexplained removal of content from the Sazerac Company article is starting to look like vandalism. Why are you doing this? —BarrelProof (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello again. I see that (at User:Ccharters) you have said "I am an employee of Sazerac Company, and am charged with weekly inspection of the Sazerac Company listing on Wikipedia. We do NOT want reference to Mr. William Goldring, nor to Kevin Richards, a Sazerac marketing director. PLEASE do not continue to add these references back into the Sazerac Company article." However, you have still not provided any reason that you want this material removed from the article. Perhaps you are not very familiar with Wikipedia. The article is not here to be an advertisement of the company point of view. Whether your company likes or dislikes the content of the article is really not a matter of much concern to Wikipedia. Can you please provide some other reason to explain why this content should be removed from the article? —BarrelProof (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello. I see that you are continuing to remove reliably-sourced information from the article about the Sazerac Company. These seem to be the only edits that you have been making, and they also seem to be the only topic discussed on your user page (at Ccharters). I suggest to further discuss the topic on the Talk:Sazerac Company, where I have tried to start a constructive conversation about the issue to determine the consensus. However, I wish to warn you that your edits do not currently appear to be justified or constructive (to me). The fact that someone does not want information to be readily available is not, by itself, adequate justification for removing the information from Wikipedia. This information is already publicly available in reliable sources that are referenced in the article. I believe there is a public interest in having information available about who owns and operates a large and notable company such as the Sazerac Company. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I see that this is continuing, and that most recently you have said that something is incorrect about the information that you are repeatedly removing. Can you please clarify what you see as being incorrect about the information you are removing? I suggest to continue this discussion on the Talk page at Talk:Sazerac Company. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Fireball Cinnamon Whisky
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Fireball Cinnamon Whisky, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Fireball (liqueur). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 17:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fireball (liqueur) with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Bentogoa (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Ccharters, if you think there is something wrong with the content of the Fireball (liqueur) article, you should discuss that on the Talk:Fireball (liqueur) page rather than creating another new article about the same product at Fireball Cinnamon Whisky. You should be especially careful about editing articles about the products made by the company that you work for, especially because you seem to be promoting the company's point-of-view rather than writing objectively. Please make sure to establish a consensus rather than just changing things to say what you want them to say. If you don't like the name of an article, there is a process for reaching a consensus to change an article name. If you would like to learn about that process for reaching a consensus, I will be happy to teach you what it is. Commenting on the Talk page about the article would be a good first step. I notice that you have never edited any article's Talk page. I suggest to give it a try. That is the appropriate place to discuss the content of an article. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)