User talk:Cckelly0

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jaideep Prabhu, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jaideep Prabhu was changed by Cckelly0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950386 on 2011-11-18T23:15:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Navi Radjou, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Navi Radjou was changed by Cckelly0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929802 on 2011-12-22T16:45:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Navi Radjou. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=467206956 here]. A520 &#124;   Talk me away! / sign it! 16:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Edits to Navi Radjou
Hi there Cckelly, I saw you edited the article on Navi Radjou. Thanks! However, I thought the previous version was slightly more refined and more encyclopedic. I think it is unwise to completely rewrite the article. The previous version had references and links to external articles. I think a better approach would be to edit the content of the article, instead of completely replacing it. I reverted the article back to it's previous revision. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them-either at my talk page or by placing on your talk page (including your question as well). If you want, you may read the introduction to using wikipedia. There are a lot of policies here, but they can all be summarized by these two- always cite what you add to an article, and try to keep a neutral point of view. Good luck! Tim 1357  talk  18:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blood orange advisory services


A tag has been placed on Blood orange advisory services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Keystoner idin (speak) 19:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)