User talk:Cclee2

Welcome!

Hello, Cclee2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of Living Persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Suction tape is an advertisement
The article Suction tape has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Suction Tape is an advertisement
The article Suction Tape has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Suction Tape
A tag has been placed on Suction Tape, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Badgernet (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bidgee (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Semantic arguments on the Wind turbine page
If you are going to make assertions about nomenclature, please back these up with references. Can you give an example of an "axial flow wind turbine" that does not have its axis oriented horizontally? Can you give an example of a "cross flow wind turbine" that does not have its axis oriented vertically? Can you give any example of this being a commonly held opinion and not just your own? If not, there is really no reason to keep pursuing this line of edits.

Your assertations about the efficiency of a horizontal axis turbine being limited because of the blade area/swept area ratio as compared to a horizontal axis turbine is a common misunderstanding. Please review this article on tip speed ratio which will help explain why this is a misconception. This article also has a discussion of why efficiency is not related to solidity (blade area/swept area) in the way that you might think.

Please take this to the talk page. Thanks! Tspine (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)