User talk:Cclewandowski

Proposed deletion of @evleaks


The article @evleaks has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references about him. Only his social media accounts and some articles written is given.  Does not pass WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of @evleaks
Hello Cclewandowski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged @evleaks for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Surfer43 (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag removed
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Article, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.Surfer43 (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of @evleaks
Hello Cclewandowski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged @evleaks for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Surfer43 (talk) 16:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of @evleaks


The article @evleaks has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Self-promotion: Article submitted and primarily written by the subject's personal assistant, Cclewandowski.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikigeek2 (talk) 06:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of @evleaks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article @evleaks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/@evleaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Protonk (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)