User talk:Ccole

Spyware
It looks like you and Ugnius have gotten off to a bit of a rough start over at Spyware. I would encourage both of you to take a deep breath and work on resolving the external links issue on the article's talk page. (I'm pleased to see that you have started to talk things out.)

Please also be aware of Wikipedia's three-revert rule, which is a sort of 'electric fence' that we employ to limit the duration of edit wars. If you find that you are undoing/redoing the same edits to an article multiple times, then there is something happening that requires discussion; continuing to revert can result in a temporary suspension of your editing privileges.

If you require a third opinion on an article, posting a request for comment can sometimes help. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:41, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Resolving issue
The rules say: "Whatever the nature of the dispute, the first resort should always be to discuss the problem with the other user. Try to resolve the dispute on your own first." So I'm open to discussion. Tell me what you see bad with site, and what information you can find on other sites? I'd like to resolve issue individually, before taking it to RCP. We can discuss it by email or here in your talk page. PS: There is no reason to ban access to your page, we can access to it through proxy. ugnius(talk)

You threaten me in e-mail and what do you expect? I am watching my domains for suspicious activity and I will block all of your access routes if necessary. I have had a website hacked before and after your threats, I will do what I have to. You want to resolve this issue? Fine, stop insulting and attacking me, my intelligence, my skills, and my grandmother and let the community decide. RainR called you on your spam. I called you on your spam and I'm sure others will too when they have a look at your website.


 * you are mixing the terms. RainR agreed that the site unique and acknowledge that SPAM was not that word. You website was deleted for the spamming, because you even wanted to add 2 links within one page, and links without the info. That is the SPAM. Of course let the community decide, its impossible to talk with you normally, you see insults where there is no any insult. I'm requesting for comment on his matter with clear evidence of your defamation. I asked you numerous time to POST real facts of what you are talkng and you failed to do that. ugnius(talk)

I am not mixing anything. I am done talking to you about this. You refuse to aknowledge RainR's comments that the reason your link didn't get deleted again was due to the 3 edit rule, not your website content. You also refuse to show just cause for keeping your link in there. Talking about my website will not elevate the status of yours. If you'll notice, I have already requested for comment. You will have to justify linking your website on your own merits. I would suggest that you be more careful with whomever does comment. They probably won't like your insults and threats either. READ THIS: I AM DONE WITH YOU ABOUT THIS. LET THE COMMUNITY DECIDE! STOP E-MAILING ME! STOP HARRASSING ME! STOP THREATENING ME! JUST STOP CONTACTING ME. Ccole 20:54, 9 October 2005 (UTC)