User talk:Ccox@adobe.com

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 18:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

January 2014
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Adobe Photoshop. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GSK ✉ ✓ 20:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

That was not an experiment, that was removing incorrect information and speculation and replacing it with authoritative information. If you are going to revert all edits with authoritative information, you really should not have editorial authority on wikipedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you.  Admr Boltz  20:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
GSK ✉ ✓ 22:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

FFS, I just love that I can't defend myself against a "sockpuppetry" claim because I can't edit the page. All I did was edits in another browser tab while typing a response to the poor editing/reversion done by GSK. I didn't intentionally violate anything, but your system grabbed an ID In one tab and an IP in another.


 * Your comments on the Photoshop article's talk page removed others' comments, which is not allowed. I could have seen this as an honest mistake, and then you removed those comments a second time as the IP address. As for a vendetta, trust me, this is nowhere near a personal vendetta. GSK ✉ ✓ 23:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

It would have been nice to know beforehand that removing speculation and replacing it with a correct answer was not "allowed", even on the talk page. Even then, your edit should have been to restore the additional (and incorrect) discussion and leave the correction posted with an editorial note about the undesirability of removing other talk. Your current actions scream vendetta, not responsible editing.


 * You're entitled to your opinion, although for what it's worth, I nominated the sockpuppet investigation for deletion because I came to feel it was unnecessary. If I really was on a personal vendetta, I would be taking any means necessary to ensure you're removed permanently from Wikipedia, and that's not the case. GSK ✉ ✓ 06:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What the fuck are you doing, seriously? The block reason SAYS TO CREATE ANOTHER ACCOUNT. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 04:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please go re-read WP:BITE. You are seriously harming this encyclopedia by driving away good editors. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 04:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * When I saw the reason for the block, I nominated the SPI for deletion because it was unnecessary. Did you even bother to read the conversation before attacking me? Everyone makes mistakes. The SPI was a mistake I made and I made sure to correct it by marking it for CSD. As a fellow editor, you should know that no one is perfect and that mistakes are made. As for BITE, Ccox is hardly a newcomer as they have been around since 2007 at the earliest, which is more than enough time to familiarize themselves with policy regarding such usernames. Forgive me if I don't share your point of view. GSK ✉ ✓ 06:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)