User talk:Ccred

Question
Can you tell me why you deleted part of The Undertaker's personal life section?Do you not think that including that he and Sara have children? Just wondering because everyone else has their children included in their personal life section. Thanks.MgHoneyBee 01:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Its simple personal life. It has been taken care at other places. Not a problem with mentioning he has kids but names and all the personal stuff is not wanted.

I don't understand why his page is made special. Everybody else has their children in their personal life section and I think he does too. I know their names are on Sara's page but i think they should be on Taker's page also.Who doesn't want that on the page?MgHoneyBee 05:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't get mad at me. I guess from your statement above"I think he does too" then you have no idea about how personal and protected he is of his personal life. What he wants you to know you will know. Stuff that got out was taken down but of course it was a tad too late. If you have read or listened to the man in countless interviews you would respect the privacy. Thanks!

I'm sorry if I sound angry but I'm not. If he wants his privacy that's great but doesn't everyone want their privacy? Kurt Angle and Ric Flair want their personal lives to stay private but they have their children mentioned on their page. I believe he sould have them on there. It mentions his wife and that's part of his private life so why not include his children?This is an encyclopedia and personal lives are included in it. MgHoneyBee 01:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying. But as far as Kurt and Ric go they arent as protective as Taker is. We don't have a problem with the mention of having kids and wife. The person who posted the intial information on his children made a huge mistake and even said so as there are so many wackos out there but the damage was done. You can kinda tell who is more private about there "out of ring" life than others.