User talk:Ccuenca11

Copyright problems with Hinduism and science
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Hinduism and science, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Hinduism and science appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Hinduism and science has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hinduism and science and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hinduism and science with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hinduism and science.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. andy (talk) 07:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * From what I recall of this article it also fails other wikipedia policies including those on original research, advocacy, neutrality, and reliable sources. Before re-creating it I suggest you familiarise yourself with these policies. andy (talk) 16:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ccuenca11


A tag has been placed on User:Ccuenca11 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20070629083916/http://www.hinduismtoday.com/in-depth_issues/cloning/cloning.shtml and https://web.archive.org/web/20080704134235/http://www.hinduismtoday.com/in-depth_issues/cloning/leadersresponse.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 16:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC)