User talk:Ccurnan

The statement that Albert Pyun is or was ever  "on trial" is false. He was not named in the lawsuit which is a civil case. He was not deposed by the Guam officials or the producer. When he was on Guam, the loan guarantee proposal was for $400,000 not $800,000. When he went to Guam, he believed in the project and trusted the producer. He informed the Guam officials that he was leaving the project before the loan was approved. He did not receive income from the loan or from any Guam companies or Guam individuals. He delivered the promised commercial to Guam cell. He delivered the promised training to Guam residents.It was assumed he did not because did not submit reimbursement request. He did not tell the German magazine that he received his pay for directing the film. He has not been inconsistant, but he also cannot correct false the statements made about him.

Albert Pyun
Albert Pyun was recently diagnosed with full blown multiple sclerosis. He will be in the hospital for treatment until his condition stabilizes. He announced that he withdrawing from screening his films at film festivals and has retired from filmmaking. ccurnan

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)