User talk:Cdajmk

Please do not remove sourced criticism without a good reason. When in doubt discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. JoshuaZ 15:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

"Incorrect Information"
Regarding this edit, could you explain what is incorrect there? JoshuaZ 16:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You've again removed information as "incorrect" but among other things, the listed book is on Amazon here. Please explain what you are doing. JoshuaZ 16:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * This isn't that complicated, the article has a talk page. It can be found at Talk:Henry F. Schaefer, III. Please discuss these removals there. JoshuaZ 16:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Please discuss your edits
Among other issues, this is far too much detail and is poorly formatted. Also, you are going to run afoul of the WP:3RR rule if this continues. JoshuaZ 16:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Your most recent edit also removed sourced criticism. Whether it is alleges are not is not as relevant as whether it is notable criticism which it is. Please stop whitewashing the article. JoshuaZ 16:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

three-revert rule
Hi Cdajmk, please do no violate the three-revert rule. Please familiarize yourself with this rule as it is official policy for Wikipedia. Contenticious issues need to be hashed out on Talk:Henry F. Schaefer, III first. Thanks. --Roswell native 17:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Indefinite block
I've blocked you as a sockpuppet. Please use your main account and please discuss matters on the talk page. Thank you. JoshuaZ 22:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)