User talk:Cdanson

Welcome!
Hello, Cdanson, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Primary Residential Mortgage, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Primary Residential Mortgage


A tag has been placed on Primary Residential Mortgage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure that if I agree that our page was unambiguous advertising as it had information similar to the Wells Fargo Wiki page and the Prospect Mortgage Wiki Page. We were not promoting anything nor trying to direct people to call us or any other type of advertising. The information was about the company and our Core Values with one award listed. That award had a reference as well. However, what do I need to do so I can make this a useful page. I read the the guide to writing your first article and probably should save it to sandbox prior to making it live. Could I get that content back so I can save it in the sandbox and review the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to make sure the page complies. Cdanson (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You'll note that neither the Wells Fargo page nor the Prospect Mortgage page list those companies' "core values". Touting one's core values is generally considered a form of advertising, and is disallowed at Wikipedia. The fact that you speak in the first person when speaking about Primary Residential Mortgage tells me that you are an employee of that company, in which case you should review Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

So the core values is considered advertisement? I have started the page again and it is my sandbox so I can have the community review it. I am trying to shy away from first person to third person and stay neutral. You can see on my user page that have written the disclaimer that conflict of interest policy states I should do. However the policy doesn't explain in detail how I should explain my relationship. Thanks for your help, I will try to get this article done and have the community review it. Cdanson (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Your sandbox article is better (not promotional) but it still is not likely to be accepted as an AFC submission. Your sources don't show evidence of significant coverage as required by Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Several of the citations appear to be press releases, one is an entry in a list (good for showing PRM's status as a top lender, but not much else). You'll need to find evidence of independent coverage in order for the article to be accepted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for all the articles. I'll keep working on the notability portion to see if I can find more sources like the awards. Thank you for your help. Cdanson (talk) 17:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)