User talk:Cdddraftsman

Who put Clay Bertrand as Clay Shaws aka?

Besides being distastful and unjust, it's simple untrue. Clay Shaw never went by that name, he denied the allegation that was made by Jim Garrison. Clay Shaw was exonerated on all charges, in a peer voted adversarial proceedure. This is defamation by libel after the fact and should be removed immediately. AAMOF Jim Garrison's whole case was fraudulent from beginning to end.

Proof? :

Judge Christenberry concluded that Garrison never had any "factual basis for questioning Shaw about the assassination" in the first place, and noted that Garrison "resorted to the use of drugs and hypnosis on Russo, purportedly to 'corroborate' but more likely to concoct his story." He referred to Garrison's treatment of Shaw as "outrageous and inexcusable" -- "a case of continuing harassment and multiple prosecutions" with the likelihood that both would "continue in the future." Christenberry then granted the defense's request for a permanent injunction.

Unfortunately, that injunction didn't apply to Garrison's literary endeavors, which he admitted in a rare moment of candor as we listen in on Garrison interview from 1976, were he talks about his then new book 'The Star Spangled Contract,' & admits his 1970 book was also fictitious! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alwGiET07G0

Interesting that Garrison could see hidden assassin's 100's of miles away in Dealey Plaza but didn't realise & never admitted one of the biggest Mafia leaders in the US, Carlos Marcello, was working his murderous crime family under his own nose in New Orleans?

The downturn in the fortunes of the United States didn't happen when JFK was assassinated, it happened in the aftermath, when conspiracy theorists took advantage of that assassination and played a charade on us folks in what contemporary historians might refer to as attempting to perpetrate The Great JFK Assassination Tragedy Conspiracy Hoaxing on America.

It didn't work.

(Cdddraftsman (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC))