User talk:Cdgillie

Welcome!
Hello, Cdgillie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mapmechanics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Exemplo347 (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Mapmechanics


A tag has been placed on Mapmechanics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mapmechanics
Hello Cdgillie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mapmechanics for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. — CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply to message at my talk page
I moved this here to keep a continuity of discussion with the previous section about the article deletion:
 * Hi Carole


 * I appreciate that this company is not large in numbers, but I will add references showing how mapmechanics is widely quoted in the press for its research and GIS systems expertise. Can you get me a week or two before deleting stuff so that I can get this stuff together please?


 * thanks


 * Chris. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdgillie (talk • contribs) 08:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Chris,
 * It looks like someone tagged it before I did and since then, someone else has already gone ahead and deleted the article, which essentially means that they agree with the reason that the article was tagged.
 * When I look at :
 * I find just a couple of sources this this custom search, the ones from Parliament seem to be the only reliable sources,
 * some in HighBeam
 * some in news that fit the definition of mainstream reliable sources, such at The Guardian, The Times, and the local Lancashire Telegraph (most of the sources though are press releases or from less than reliable mainstream sources.) A lot of these mention Kingswood Mapmechanics. Is that the same thing?


 * If Kingswood Mapmechanics and Mapmechanics are the same organization, then there may be sufficient sources to meet general notability guidelines or organization notability guidelines. I suggest looking over those guidelines and if you think that the situation fits, then start the article in  Draft:Mapmechanics (or use Draft:Kingswood Mapmechanics, if that is more generally used). That will give you time to write the article and build it with reliable, secondary sources. I am happy to help as well.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk)  18:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I just saw that someone mentioned that you use your sandbox. That's a good way to go as well. You may want to replace Daily Mail and the Ordnance Survey (which very much looks like a company-supplied description) with one of the sources identified above to help strengthen your case of coverage by reliable, mainstream sources.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 18:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Carole,

Thanks for your help, I have edited existing pages for a long time, but never created one before, so am on a bit of a learning curve. I will read through your guidance and improve my draft. :-) Cdgillie (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Sure. I am assuming then that Kingwood Mapmechanics and Mapmechanics are the same. It kind of looked that way, but I wasn't positive. If I can help, please let me know.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, yes, they were originally Kingswood, and then changed name, I am still trying to get dates for that as well as dates of other significant events. I will keep pottering away on the sandbox version for a while, fleshing it out and trying to keep the style and tone in keeping with that of Wikipedia and let you know how I get on. Many thanks for your help! Cdgillie (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)