User talk:Cdiprose

December 2009
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 07:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:48, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I understand wikipedia is not a list of links, but I am trying to understand why the edit on this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrator_(sex_toy), was reverted. I believe the article linked to, and extra information added to the wikipedia entry, provides an excellent comparison and review of vibrators which wikipedia fails to offer. In addition to the comparison of certain vibrators, the article also provides insight, and explanation of what vibrators suit certain peoples likes - again, wikipedia is not providing this kind of answer or information for people. While the site sells toys, the article page itself is more of a FAQ answer section, and seems to be designed to help people in choosing the most appropriate vibrator for them. Plus the in-depth comparison of vibrators, their features and the specific kinds of products suited. It might well be on a sex toy site, but this does not diminish the level of detail in the article, and excellent information that it provides.

Article -

I might also add this is not dis-similar to other articles, in other sections of wikipedia, for example, citation 17 on this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_lubricant

Cdiprose (talk) 01:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Chris
 * Thanks for pointing out the link on Personal lubricant; it has been removed. Add another link and you will be blocked indefinitely. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

ok, no problems, I understand - given the other article was linked there, you can maybe understand why I would want clarification on it. Anyway, thanks for clarifying.

You might want to remove 2 other items on the same page .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrator_(sex_toy) [16] - article is no longer live + they sell products [19] - promoting 3 brands

All the best! Cdiprose (talk) 02:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Chris