User talk:Cdkading

Nice work!
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Cdkading (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Cdkading, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Brecca
Here are some ideas I have found for a topic: Theodore Simon -He is an individual listed on the stub suggestions on Blackboard and does not have much information on him on wikipedia. -There is information on him in our book in Ch. 13 that could be helpful Resistance (psychoanlaysis) -This is another stub suggestion on Blackboard -There is information on this topic in Ch. 11 which would be helpful for us to use Another idea I thought of was doing something related to sports psychology, such as a person or some particular topic. I noticed we could maybe expand information on Coleman Griffith who is given credit with the discovery of sports psychology, so we could do some research on him possibly. Those are a few ideas I came across. What have you guys found for topic ideas? Brecca.W (talk) 20:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Chris
I like the idea of doing something related to sports psychology, and Coleman Griffith seems like a good option. I did a quick google search on him and it seems like there would be a good amount of information available. The other ideas seem good too, but I think it would be harder to find information on Simon, and the Resistance page has a good start on it already, which would make it harder to improve. Here are some other options I found; both are from Ch. 15 in our book. -Augusta Fox Bronner, a female psychologist who worked with delinquent youth. -Naomi Norsworthy, the first female Ph.D. at Columbia. Neither of them have had a Wikipedia article written about them yet, so we would be able to create our own from scratch. I was able to find some information on Augusta Fox Bronner and her work seems interesting. However, I think going with someone like Coleman Griffith would be easier. Let me know what you think. Cdkading (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Erin
I like the idea of doing something on sports psychology as well! Coleman Griffith would be interesting for sure. I've also read a book called the psychology of enhancing human performance which was written by Frank Gardner and Zella Moore. It talks about a topic called the mindfulness acceptance commitment (MAC) approach to enhancing human performance. It's pretty interesting topic and there's no wikipedia articles on either the topic or those two psychologists. You guys should check it out and see if it's interesting to you. Out of the other ones you guys mentioned I think Coleman Griffith would be my first choice, and then Augusta Fox Bronner my second. erin.teschuk (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Brecca
I would say my top choices of what was mentioned would be if we want to do a person then either Coleman Griffith or Augusta Fox Bronner. If we would rather do a topic then the mindfulness acceptance commitment (MAC) sounds interesting to me too. What do you guys think for our top 2 choices? Not sure if doing an individual or a psychology topic would be better.Brecca.W (talk) 03:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Chris
Would everyone be okay with putting Coleman Griffith as our fist choice? Either of the authors of the book Erin mentioned or Augusta Fox Bronner would be a good second choice for me. I looked up mindfulness acceptance commitment and a Wikipedia article for acceptance and commitment therapy came up. Are they similar? If not, that would be a good second choice too.Cdkading (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Erin
I like the idea of putting Coleman Griffith as our first choice. I would also be okay with putting Augusta Fox Bronner as the second. Seems like she would be interesting to research. Do you guys just want to do that? Cdkading (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.230.113 (talk)

Brecca
That sounds good to me. Coleman Griffith first choice and Augusta Fox Bronner as second choice, if everyone is okay with that. Brecca.W (talk) 00:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Chris
Sounds good to me! 1) Coleman Griffith 2) Augusta Fox Bronner Cdkading (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Coleman Griffith - good choice!
Hi Group 15, I had never heard of Coleman Griffith before this, but this looks like a very good Wikipedia article to expand. The article is not really a stub, but there's a lot of room for improvement. You could add an info box, picture, and table of contents, for starters. (If you split up the article and add section headings, the TOC will be generated automatically.) From what is there already, I'm guessing you can find a lot of new information to add to the article. J.R. Council (talk) 03:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Coleman Griffith - References & Questions
Hi everyone Looking at the current wikipedia page for Coleman Griffith I think one of the main things we need to change is to add some more headings and sub-headings such as add subheadings to the biography as well as add in some sections on his work and theories. I found some sources that seem like they'll be useful for this, especially in adding more information on his work and ideas in sports psychology. 1) Miller, K. G. (1927). Review of The Psychology of Coaching. Psychological Bulletin, 24(10), 608-609 2) Gould, D., & Pick, S. (1995). Sport psychology: The Griffith era, 1920–1940. The Sport Psychologist, 9(4), 391-405

Two questions: 1) Would it be best to make a general introduction heading for him, or should we just keep it as it is with the biography being the main opening section? 2) Is it worth adding information on early or personal life, or should we just start with his contributions to psychology?

Erin.teschuk (talk) 02:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Erin TeschukErin.teschuk (talk) 02:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)