User talk:Cdlj 05

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:K.a.o.s & Lloyd-Jones.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Image 2.jpg. The copy called Image:Image 2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Me New.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Me New.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Christopher Lloyd-Jones and related images

 * Wikipedia is not a toy, nor is is a place for your nonsense. Do not create nonsense articles, or upload nonsense images. Doing so is considered vandalism, and may result in your being blocked from wikipedia. Improbcat


 * Also, do not remove deletion tags, as you did with Christopher Lloyd-Jones and two associated images. This is also considered vandalism and may result in your being blocked from wikipedia. If you wish to dispute the tags, the means to do so is noted in the tags. However as you have stated that the page is nonsense, I don't seem uch point in trying to dispute it. Improbcat 19:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Christopher Lloyd-Jones (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Still_Taken_From_Video_To_Single_"Silverworld".jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Still_Taken_From_Video_To_Single_"Silverworld".jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 04:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)