User talk:Cdph414

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Janet Lim-Napoles has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Janet Lim-Napoles was changed by Cdph414 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900868 on 2013-11-07T19:56:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeane Napoles


Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I've also reverted your changes to the article about her mother. In both cases, the reason is that the reference you cited to support your negative claim was flawed, as explained at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/11/jeane-napoles-_n_4085238.html. Also, your characterization of the mother's occupation as "self-proclaimed" was an unwarranted personal observation. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Janet Lim-Napoles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''When people's occupations are given, we do not insert "self-proclaimed" in front of it unless we present evidence that they are proclaiming it and that their proclamation is false. To do otherwise is to introduce unsupported bias into the article, in violation of Wikipedia's neutrality policy. Please do not do this again.'' —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Janet Lim-Napoles, you may be blocked from editing. You still aren't providing any support for the editorial comments you are inserting into the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)