User talk:Cdysart

Welcome!
Hello, Cdysart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Cdysart, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! INeverCry  22:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cdysart


A tag has been placed on User:Cdysart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. INeverCry  22:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I think either it wasn't explained properly, or you misunderstood. Your actual user page is to tell us about yourself. Drafts of articles go in sub pages like this. I'll have a look at the deleted text and see if it can be restored to your sandbox for further work, and then come back here to comment further.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll restore the content to the sandbox shortly, but some comments
 * To shows that it meets the notability guidelines, you need to tell us something about the company, not just who it has worked for. How many employees? Turnover? Profits?
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples include offering insight to facilitate business decisions and to enhance the healthcare market... In fact nearly all the lead is form the company's website telling us how wonderful it is, rather than explaining why it is notable.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.


 * Not a reason for deletion, but your references would be more intelligible formatted like rather than a bare url. Also add links to other article (I'll put in one or two)


 * I'll sandbox the text shortly, cheers  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rare Disease Report


A tag has been placed on Rare Disease Report requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Gnome de plume (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Healthcare Research & Analytics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Healthcare Research & Analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Healthcare Research & Analytics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  SITH   (talk)   17:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)