User talk:Ceas webmaster

respond, and neither you can just revert indiscriminately. --soum talk 15:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, if I sounded bitey in the statement above. Anyways, I will be going offline soon. Take a look at the revisions I made, and lest I miss your comment, please put a note on my talk page when you reply to the discussion. --soum talk 18:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I have replied to the issue with the environmental policy. The policy is important for Picsearch and for our users. I have provided multiple sources from The Times, The Internatinal Herald Tribune and AltSearchEngine, who also think this is important. There is no dispute as I can see it.--Carl Sarnstrand 10:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Now, I have rewritten the article and added references to all statements. Could you please advice me if you want any more changes or if we can reach concensus.--Carl Sarnstrand 14:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

wiki-bb interlinking
http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?InterMap

Picsearch
I took a preliminary look at the article. Though it is well sourced, and the content is suitable, the language seems a bit vaunting. Although I will need to take a closer look to fell which words are problemmatic. Also some sentence constructs like "Family-friendliness implies that all sexual nudity, pornography and violence will be filtered away. However, no filtering process can be flawless and therefore Picsearch offers an image removal service for removing single images upon request" sounds more like a PR material than an encyclopedia entry. I am logging off now, I will take a closer look later and try nuking some of the PoV. --soum talk 16:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, it would be better if the thumbnails in the screenshots could be replaced by ones which have a less strict license (like creative commons). You may take the shot by searching CC pics from Flickr (if they are in index). --soum talk 16:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm not maintaning the page - the PR director from Picsearch, User:Carl_Sarnstrand is. He wants the tags taken down, I think it still sounds iffy. --Ceas webmaster 17:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The article is not even nearly ready to be stripped off the tags. It still relies too heavily on first hand sources. For technical information, this is fine. But not for statistics. And the conflict of interest does not look good. But, as I already said, I need to take a closer look to pinpoint the specifics. I will do that later and mention on the article talk page. You may also want him to refrain from actively editing the article. The COI he has with the article means the point of view of mentioning something has a very high chance of getting biased. If he wants something included, he might bring it to our notice on the talk page and let us decide the best way of putting that. Also because of the COI, COI might get slapped on it, and that might lead to the article being deleted. --soum talk 17:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your input on the Picsearch article. I have made some more changes according to the people commenting on the article. I was encourage to fix the article, and have tried to do my best. --Carl Sarnstrand 20:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Please review the article again and read the comments in my talk as well as on the article discussion. --Carl Sarnstrand 23:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Picsearch article updated...
Picsearch article updated... Please go through Mugunth 08:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)