User talk:Cebderby

Solar Cycle
"(Undid revision 671598235 by 100.35.33.88 (talk) Repetition of solar conditions is not repetition of earth conditions.)"

Currently the headline paragraph makes a tentative claim there could be a slight decrease in temperature - i.e. it *is* linking the repetition of this solar condition to Earth's condition.

In your undo comment you justify the undo by saying the two are not linked - but then how can you be happy with the claim that currently exists? it is is in contradiction to your justification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.35.33.88 (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your description of change: you could in the last Maunder Minimum wallk from Manhattan to Staten Island - this seems to warrent more than being called "a slight lowering of temperatures" indicated that you were copying the false connection reported by the less scientifically competent (and/or economically/politically motivated) reports that some sort of 'ice age' would occur. Example predicted earth responses to a Maunder-minimum-like solar state in the 2030s are contained in the Washington Post article and elsewhere, e.g. '0.1 deg C at most', 'barely detectable blip' etc. Or for another expert opinion, on RealClimate the effect was described as a change in solar forcing of about -0.1W/m2, which would be made up in just 3 years of current CO2 concentration growth. Cebderby (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)