User talk:Ceboomer

November 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I can vouch for ceboomer (14k+ edits over 14 years). They are my assistant working as an extension of my directive. These are simply edits that I have instructed them to make at my behest, as many of the edits are tedious. It's certain the link placement was accidental, as they are still learning the ropes and made an honest mistake. Please revoke the ban so they can continue being a useful contributor. Electricmaster (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Let me make sure I understand what you've been doing. Ceboomer is not an alternative account but a separate person with their own account? They are your assistant in real life? So they are an employee of yours and part of their duties has been to edit Wikipedia when you ask them to? Is all of that correct? If not, please explain what is correct and any additional explanation of this, uh, arrangement. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That is correct. If this breaks some kind of rule, I was not aware of it. The account was only created for practical purposes, and there is no malice intended. Additionally, as you can see, the Ceboomer account has not being used in any form of sockpuppetry or to unfairly influence any matters such as voting or edit warring. Thanks. Electricmaster (talk) 05:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Any other employees of yours assisting you in editing Wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No, this is the only one. Employee is sort of disingenuous. He is basically just actioning my requests. In other words, these are 1:1 actions I would do myself if I had the time. Electricmaster (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There is nothing "disinigenuous" about any of this. You already confirmed above that Ceboomer is your employee.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This is completely insane. The only reason this is a problem is because the Philippines get a lot of IP-ban issues. He could have literally just copied the source code for me to paste after sandboxing it and we wouldn't even be having this issue. I am not paying them anything to do this. I'm failing to see the problem here. Electricmaster (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This is my last comment, at least for a while. I have no idea what Filipino IPs have to do with any of this. I didn't block any IPs, and I didn't block Ceboomer for anything having to do with the Philippines. Indeed, I didn't know that Ceboomer was from the Philippines, assuming that's what you're saying. Employees are paid. Therefore, you are paying Ceboomer. You already verified this.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No, you insinuated it, and I misunderstood your meaning. At no point did I say money changed hands... just that they were helping me out on a project. Filipino IPs were banned for unregistered accounts, so they created a new one. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. Electricmaster (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You created your account on February 27, 2023. Your first edit was on March 3. You have made 46 edits since then, only two of which were to article space. You made two consecutive edits today to Australian Football Hall of Fame, which were reverted because they incorrectly placed a project link in an article. If appropriate, such edits should be made to the Talk page of an article, not the article itself.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)