User talk:Cecethack/Facial expression/Paytdaddy Peer Review

Thank you all for giving me such great feedback. It is always nice to get feedback in a positive way, sometimes you don’t see what needs to be fixed or tweaked a little bit. Thank you again for taking the time to go over my article that I have been revising and giving such great feedback. I liked reading what you all had to say and will do my best to try and do the things that you suggested. KatiePetti - “ I would consider structuring the article based on a research timeline.” “It’s missing citations in several areas” I plan to do exactly what KatiePetti said, I think that it is a great idea to have a timeline. There has been a lot of research done on this and some dates back to Darwin so I think the timeline would help. I don’t know exactly how to go about this but will defiantly find out and add this to the article. It will defiantly help with reading the article and making it clearer. I will also be going in and try to cite the places that do not have the proper citations. I know there are a lot of good references, but they are not cited in the article. Gen Wood - “Overly detailed, I feel like it starts going into theories that come later instead of just sticking with what the article is about.” I will go in and try to revise the lead, to make it not go into too much detail too early and say with what the article is about. Sometimes I know that people tend to go a little crazy in the beginning, but I will try to revise that in my article. I don’t think there is very much else I will do to fix the article other than the things I have listed above. At least not at this time.