User talk:Cecildeed

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stephanie Leonidas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stephanie Leonidas was changed by Cecildeed (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.803506 on 2010-11-19T09:40:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Deceptive WP:Edit summaries, and WP:Edit warring
Hello, Cecildeed. I've seen a few of your edits earlier this year, and the edits I saw of yours during that time were not what I would categorize as good. So it is not surprising to me that these two edits I am about to mention are in the same "not good" vein: This and this. Those are just two examples of your inappropriate edits. I and many others at this site have zero tolerance for that type of thing (deceptive edit summaries), especially from a Wikipedia editor who has been at this site for as long as you have and should have learned Policies and guidelines by now. Your edit at the Emily Fitch article was removed today by Grayfell because it was WP:Unsourced, and I reverted you at the Clitoris article because your edit removed a core piece of text that is supported by the WP:Reliable sources attributed to it. If I see you continue to make edits like that, which are clearly deceptive by the nature of their edit summaries, I will report you at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (WP:ANI). Also understand that WP:Edit warring, something that you clearly continue to partake in at The Matrix article (your latest edit there seen here) is against policy and you can be blocked from editing Wikipedia for that. You should read the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (WP:BRD) essay for what are usually the appropriate means to take when you are reverted. I see your lack of regard for whatever rules Wikipedia may have with this statement. But know this: If you do not follow the rules of this site, it will eventually lead to your being blocked from editing it. The Wachowskis matter, as I'm sure you know, has been extensively debated; this link shows that. Therefore, considering that the edits you keep making at The Matrix article are a part of an unresolved dispute among editors, it is inappropriate (by Wikipedia standards) for you to continue to reinsert such edits. If WP:Consensus is against you on such edits, then it is very inappropriate (by Wikipedia standards) for you to continue making such edits. WP:Consensus is a policy, and it usually should not knowingly be violated (no matter the cause).

Something I meant to state to you before: This edit was not an improvement to me, considering that the term lesbian often and validly refers to female same-sex romance and/or female same-sex sexual activity in general, as is evidenced by dictionaries, encyclopedias, scholarly texts, marketing, the media and the lesbian community. But at least your edit summary there was descriptive and not deceptive. Flyer22 (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Andrej Pejić, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Academy Award for Best Original Song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Les Miserables (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Opulence Sundae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armagnac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regional Theatre Tony Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Signature Theatre Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Academy Award for Best Costume Design, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page With a Song in My Heart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of contenders to 87th Academy Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Virunga and Life Itself. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of adventure films of the 1970s, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kevin Connor and John Hough. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BAFTA Award for Best Costume Design, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mr. Turner and The Theory of Everything (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Destiny (video game), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Soetermans. T / C 00:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi Cecildeed,

Please note that the edit summary is intended to show what you've edited to the article. While adding 'with children' is by all means okay to add, it is not a grammatical error you fixed. Please fill in what you've actually done. --Soetermans. T / C 16:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page   Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film). ''Per WP:FILMPLOT we keep summaries to 400-700 words and trivial additions are not necessary. They accumulate over time and bloat the plot considerably.'' Elizium23 (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Shailene Woodley
Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted you made to Shailene Woodley. The source currently cited in the article is the interview where she made the statement about not being a feminist, but this source doesn't discuss what other people said about her comments. We need a source that discusses these later comments from other people, such as perhaps a followup story from Time magazine. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Hateful Eight, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  03:08, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fictional heirs apparent who never acceded until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gay men, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And then there's those highly misleading edit summaries in Lesbian, as and I noted. What is up with that? Drmies (talk) 03:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jin Se-yeon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  09:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jin Se-yeon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  05:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GMM 25, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuri. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Cecildeed! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)