User talk:Cecilia grace fan

Welcome!

Hello, Cecilia grace fan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cecilia grace, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- The Σ talkcontribs 18:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Cecilia grace


A tag has been placed on Cecilia grace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- The Σ talkcontribs 18:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Reason, and I didn't delete your page. I'm not an admin. -- The Σ talkcontribs 19:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)



A tag has been placed on Cecilia grace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. PTJoshua (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Re
Did you not read "All new messages to the bottom"? Putting messages at the top messes up my automated archiving. Please heed the message else you receive no response. -- The Σ talkcontribs 18:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * -- The Σ talkcontribs 18:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Cecilia grace
Hi. I'm sorry some of the other people that edit the Wikipedia might not have been very nice to you. However, it's not really anybody's job here to help you make articles, especially when it's an article that probably doesn't stand much of a chance of meeting all our rules. Yep, I know we call it 'The encyclopedia anyone can edit', but the downside is that it doesn't mean 'anyone can write about just anything'. Gecilia Grace (notice the capital letters) has been deleted because she apparently hasn't done enough to get a record contract, sell a million discs, and get written about in proper books and newspapers. That's it I'm afraid. Nevertheless, I'm pretty sure you didn't join Wikipedia just to write about her, so if you come up with an article and write it in your sandbox first, where it won't get deleted, you can always ask me on my talk page what I think about it. If it looks good, I might even offer some help. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Re
Stop editing an old revision of my talk page. You're readding stuff I cleaned out. -- The Σ talkcontribs 17:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Click the "talk" button that appears right next to Σ in my signature. -- The Σ talkcontribs 17:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Cecilia grace
I've tried to be helpful to you and I've explained at length why there is not going to be an article about Cecilia Grace whose - name you can't even spell properly. Please stop bothering other editors about it, otherwise you might get into trouble for being disruptive. I suggest you now really take the time to read up on our policies before you write anything else on Wikipedia, including on people's talk pages, because we have rules for that too, and you'll probably get no more help from anyone until you have. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

One more suggestion
You may also like to spend a few minutes reading Guidance for younger editors. Feedback on it is also very welcome. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Another suggestion
You stated on my talk page that you were 16. You might want to read User:Fetchcomms/Children_and_Wikipedia for more details. -- The Σ talkcontribs 01:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Really? This seems to be another essay that isn't principally of use to the people that it is about. Don't you think? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * After the introduction, sections 1 and 2. -- The Σ talkcontribs 02:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * True, the essay is not  aimed at  children, but children in the  10 - 16 age group who have an advanced cognition  for their years  may  learn a lot  from  it, particularly those  who can act in  a grown up  manner, are capable of functioning  in  a highly collaborative environment, and are ready  to  take on  responsible tasks such  as editing  the encyclopedia and giving  advice to  others. I would urge children of any age or level  of maturity to  read anything we have on  the topic of young  editors - especially  those who have difficulty  in understanding  our rules, and/or interacting  with  other editors. If they  understand it, there is a lot  gained, if they  don't, there is nothing  lost. What  many  of our editors (who  may  be not  much  older) must  learn, is to  be kinder to  all new editors,  provide warm and welcoming advice rather than curt statements, and offer  a friendly environment  on their own talk and user pages. Plenty  of 'Sue is awesome' page creators have gone on  to  create DYK, GA, and  a bothersome kid today could very  easily  become the CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation in  ten years time. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Just so. But while I often ask apparent teenagers to read a potentially very useful essay, I would steer well clear of identifying apparent teenagers for the purpose of then feeding them a list of reading material that some of them could feel explains reasons to discriminate against them. After all, the feedback we have so far, is that most consider even the first essay to be over-long. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That is very  true, walls of text  are endemic at  Wikipedia. Most  of the essays, policies, adults and instructions are written  by adults who  tend to  forget  that  an extraordinary  high  percentage of users are  young  people. That's why  after a discussion  with  Brad, I  recast  his essay -` and it's still  to  long! Even the Article Wizard, created in  the very  best  of good faith,  is a tad confusing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Cecilia grace fan. You have new messages at Σ's talk page. --21:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)