User talk:Cedar101

Welcome to Wikipedia
allen四names 20:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571400415 your edit] to Pike (programming language) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * * The curly brackets enclose the function and the semicolon separates statements meaning the function could have been written on a single line:

Broadcast XML Nominated for deletion
Broadcast Markup Language has been nominated for deletion by a user who is involved in trying to delet the BeerXML article and is now trawling Wikipedia for other articles to delete because they are losing that debate and feel that if other XML derived standards are deleted it might help them win the argument they are losing. Please challenge its deletion if you feel this is an unnacceptable. Regards Devils In Skirts! (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hello world program examples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accumulator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

source lang="68000devpac"
The Motorola 6800 microprocessor is an 8-bit microprocessor while the Motorola 68000 is a 16/32 bit microprocessor. While some of the instructions are the same most are different. When you add source lang="68000devpac" less than half the instructions show up in color. I have removed the change. - SWTPC6800 (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big data, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

languages for source
Hi, re. What is "moin", and where can I find a list of valid languages? -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That list is https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi/blob/master/SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi.lexers.php. The "moin" means MoinMoin wiki. Also "trac-wiki" is similar to mediawiki. c.f. http://www.wikimatrix.org/compare/MediaWiki+MoinMoin+TracWiki -- Cedar101 (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Unfortunately no expansions or explanations are given. I guess that many of them only mean something to those who know about that language. But it does explain why people have been altering the previously-valid  and   to  . It's also justification to fix up several of 's edits where they insisted on using   for wiki markup (e.g. ), which (three times) I asked them not to. -- Red rose64 (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there info written up on any help page on Wikipedia about using and   as valid values for the   attribute. The two appear to be synonymous. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I noticed Cedar101 making changes on help pages, and so I googled it and found lang=wikitext listed as OK somewhere. Nice to have a pair of shortcuts. --Timeshifter (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Matrix splitting
Thank you for updating the Matrix splitting article. I created the page a few years ago, but that was before I knew how to use NumBlk and EquationRef, so I kludged it. Since then, I have gone back and cleaned up some of my work, but I evidently missed that article. Happy editing! — Anita5192 (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

mvar and math
I have revered the format changes to Noetherian ring. Please do not introduce templates ,

. They are ugly and have some other issues. -- Taku (talk) 06:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Without and, 'I'(i) and 'l'(L) is not distinguishable. Using , more readability is acheived. See MOS:MATH and WP:Rendering math. -- Cedar101 (talk) 01:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * In such a case (I, l case), it makes sense to use or the templates. In any case, it is considered disruptive to change the format without establishing the consensus to do so. Before undergoing any format change, please justify why such a change is needed. -- Taku (talk) 07:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

I strongly support. You are going through articles introducing changes in the formatting that are undesirable and very questionable under Math. I have undone some of your edits, but there are too many for me to undo them all. I ask you to get a consensus of editors to support your changes before making any further such edits to Wikipedia. 86.181.148.81 (talk) 11:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Let me add another comment. Longstanding practice allows for articles to use HTML/wikicode formatting for math -- it is completely acceptable. Unless there is a specific consensus that a particular article should change, the style that has already been established should be preserved. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 13:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia articles must have the editing quality of printed books. Lacks of math or is not qualified for printed books. -- Cedar101 (talk) 14:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Having the quality of a printed book is an excellent goal, but it is not a Wikipedia priority. Other issues, such as HTML rendering in general, prevent it from happening any time soon. Stability of formatting is important to many people, however. It is perfectly acceptable on Wikipedia to use HTML/wikicode to format math (like this: C = 2&pi;r).  Many editors prefer that method for short formulas, because it helps the mathematics font match the text font, which is more like what would be found in printed books.  Please don't make wholesale changes from one format to the other solely for the sake of change. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 14:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Why the mathematics font match the text font? On the contrary, the mathematical equations in most technical printed books have been set up using seperately mathematical fonts. In HTML, We have MathML stardard. All modern web browsers support it. The equations by MathML is a part of HTML5 semantic markup. -- Cedar101 (talk) 06:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

You are making changes to the way Wikipedia displays mathematics. Many of those changes are opposed by some editors. You do not have a right to impose your opinions on Wikipedia. If you believe that the changes you have been making are for the better, it is up to you to convince other editors: e.g. by getting the relevant Wikipedia policies changed. There is a procedure for this.

If you continue to make opposed edits, without first establishing a consensus, I will report you to the Wikipedia administrators. It is very likely that you will be temporarily banned. If you continue, you may be permanently banned.

For myself, I like some of your edits and dislike others. But I do not get to impose my opinions any more than you, or indeed any individual editor. Your most-recent edit, to Cobweb plot, looks to be improper; I have reverted it.



TheSeven (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Name mangling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polymorphism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

assembly listing
There's still a problem splitting the sample assembly listting in Assembly language - the line numbers and (more importantly) the oblect code still don't line up with the corresponding source lines. This shows up both on my iPad and on a PC with Firefox. Perhaps you can force some blank lines into the object code (nbsp) to force alignment? Peter Flass (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * In my all desktop systems(IE with PC and Safari, Chrome and Firefox with Mac), the source codes are aliged rightly. Anyway, I replaced the code text to the image. -- Cedar101 (talk) 00:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Both image and text versions look good now. Peter Flass (talk) 00:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subtyping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contravariance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flagship compiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pascal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Forth (programming language)
I reverted your edit changing the Hello World example to be printed using lang=factor. Factor isn't quite forth, and there's no point in changing one of several examples in the article to use that highlighting. I suspect if you change all the examples in the article, you'll eventually run into the syntactical differences between forth and factor, so it's better to not try to use that. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

IBM 1130 FORTRAN
That's all well and good, except that the resulting displayed text is broken. Look at the //JOB and //FOR lines. - Denimadept (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Okay, so you've still got an issue about syntax highlighting? Why? We're not using it, so it's not broken. When we used it, it was broken. - Denimadept (talk) 07:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

The fact that it took you so much effort to use shows the highlighting module isn't worth using. I'm impressed you forced it to work anyway, but I think it was a lot of effort for no purpose. - Denimadept (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That isn't much effort. I copyed and pasted that HTML source that mw:Extension:SyntaxHighlight generates. Everyone can do it! :) -- Cedar101 (talk)

use of markup
Hi, I noticed your edits and have a remark. Many of them are using obsolete markup that shoul not be used, such as "valign" in tables. I'd like to ask you to stop using such (old HTML) markup and use style attributes instead. Also, for editability, please leave the formatting (such as in LaTeX symbols) on multiple lines instead of using a single line; it makes manual editing much easier. Thank you. 10:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, I used style attributes instead of old html(align, valign), and indent list instead of  . -- Cedar101 (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * cellspacing is also obsolete.  11:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

As I have pointed out before, please do not randomly convert the way math is formatted in articles. The standard way to format mathematics on Wikipedia is with the &lt;math> tag and with HTML/wikicode formatting. The math and mvar templates are neither required nor even suggested as improvements, and there is no general goal of converting articles to use them. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Opinions differ, and there is no set standard for simple inline math, for which math is intended. There is nothing wrong in making content wihting one page consistent.  11:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Making a page consistent within the usage it already has is fine. Of course, if a page does not include any uses of mvar or math, then there is no reason to add these templates in an effort to make it consistent - consistency is easy to achieve by editing without using these templates. The general spirit of Wikipedia is that, if there is no standard that applies to all articles, then editors should respect the style that is already used in each article, rather than making edits solely to change articles to their desired optional style. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 11:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Fmt for formulas
I personally dont like the font selection for the formulas that were inserted for BaSO4. More generally, my opinion doesnt count, but the community's views do count. So I encourage you to check at Talk:Chemistry about fonts for such an emblematic aspect of our articles. Also, we typically avoid indicating states in equations. --Smokefoot (talk) 11:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I introduced ce tag in the new features of Mediawiki. It uses the TeX's mhchem package that formats chemical equations automatically. -- Cedar101 (talk)
 * I reverted that line to the original format. A couple of comments:
 * I don't have any particular preference for one format over another, but the guiding principle of Wikipedia is consistency. If you are going to be changing the format of how chemical equations are being presented, you should do the entire article not just select a random line and change that line (which I complained to you about earlier when you were doing programming languages). The usage should be consistent in an entire article.
 * Which leads to a second point, this is something that should probably be discussed at Talk:Chemistry before you start making wholesale changes across Wikipedia.
 * Discussing a major project like this at Talk:Chemistry will save you a lot of effort if eventually enough people get irritated and simply wholesale revert every edit you ever made. That latter situation is unusual, but I've seen it happen when a conflict erupted and resolution was against the large-scale changes made by an editor. So now that you've had multiple people feed back to you that you're making mistakes, it's time you start getting to the "D" of WP:BRD. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, I started the discussion in Talk:Chemistry. -- Cedar101 (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that should have been Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 17:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721022026 your edit] to Chemiluminescence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * aequorin, found in certain jellyfish, which produces blue light in the presence of calcium . It can be used in molecular biology to assess calcium levels in cells. What these biological
 * :::{Luciferin} + {O2} + ATP - [\text{Luciferase}] {Oxyluciferin} + {CO2} + {AMP} + {PPi} + light

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721048132 your edit] to Chemiluminescence may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Per the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry discussion, there are many substantial concerns with use of &lt;ce>, either at all, or at least where there is not an existing problem to be solved. You are not helping to gain support for your idea by ignoring those who have voiced legitimate-sounding concerns with it.'' DMacks (talk) 03:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Organorhodium
Hello,

Could you look at your recent edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organorhodium_chemistry#Examples? The examples disappear. I checked with my mobile, and the page doesn't display the examples. I'm not familiar with TeX-based formatting.

Thanks!

Georginho (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Organorhodium_chemistry_examples.png Which are the disappeared examples? I can see the all examples (See my screenshot.). Try "MathML with SVG or PNG fallback" renderer that can be selected in the user preferences; -- Cedar101 (talk) 08:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * This is my screenshot: http://s33.postimg.org/v9hrgdjnz/Organorhodium.png. Rendering indeed does help. But does everybody has this renderer option selected by default? (I don't have to enable this to see math formulae.) Perhaps, this is something for you to look into? Cheers! Georginho (talk) 08:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Would you have a reference for the "recovering ..." section of the "odds ratio"page? Thanks very much for any guidance you can provide. ODa23 (talk) 13:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Mvar, tmath, etc.
As pointed out here back in January - please don't add templates such as math, tmath, mvar, etc. to articles that don't use them. The ordinary style of formatting mathematics is perfectly acceptable, and preferred by many editors. If you think that for some reason a particular article needs to change, get consensus on the talk page first - but keep in mind that the templated version is not objectively an improvement, it's just an optional style used by a minority of math articles. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 10:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Regarding Semi-membership - it does not seem that much more copyediting is needed. Italic "HTML" formatting is a valid way to format mathematics, per WP:MOSMATH section 7.2. There is no reason to change the article to use the tmath template. Please don't go to existing articles and convert them wholesale from one style of math formatting to another. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 10:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Synthesis Iodobenzene.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Synthesis Iodobenzene.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Converse nonimplication page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=743578427 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F743578427%7CConverse nonimplication%5D%5D Ask for help])

Math chem
It seems the math chem thingy rather messed up on Zanazziite and Sodium silicate - and I've removed it. Please check the results when using it. Also the resulting big bold format is garish and distracting. Vsmith (talk) 15:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hydronium. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You know you don't have consensus for these widespread changes, and this symbol specifically was raised months ago as not being an improvement. DMacks (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Ragel syntax for Regular expression
Hi Cedar101, thanks for introducing means 'concat' in Haskell. --Ancheta Wis   (talk  &#124; contribs) 10:37, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * For syntax highlighting, I apply another language that is reasonably similar, even if the source code is not in that language. -- Cedar101 (talk) 01:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Ferric oxalate: "hydrate" macros and chem-chem/ markup
Hi. Thanks for your good will edits to ferric oxalate article. However, I must ask you to refrain from doing similar edits in the future: All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 12:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The macro creates a totally superfluous link to water of crystallization every time it is used. One should avoid multiple links from the same word to the same article.
 * Even one such link is superfluous. The link should be on the "tetrahydrate" word instead.
 * The markup creates an image link which does not take into account the font choice by the reader.  One should use the  or ... templates instead, that typeset the formula using the current fonts.
 * While it is OK to improve the appearance to an article while editing its substantive contents, one should not edit an article solely to make cosmetic edits.
 * The template is used for consistent notations. To remove the redundant link, I added  parameter.
 * emulates partially the original  markup, which can typeset automatically without effort to use of HTML tags. I replaced with, but I had to change markups. -- Cedar101 (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the reply. However, I must disagree about the template being useful for "consistent notations".  That might be the case if ALL hydrates were marked by it.  Since that will never hapen, the template only ADDS inconsistency, because it is just one MORE way to typeset hydration water. More generally, a template must be really helpful to be worth defining. That accounting starts very negative, because each new template is one more thing that editors must learn to effectively edit articles.  I estimate that 90% of the templates that have been defined have negative value, and Wikipedia would be much better if they were deleted and possibly replaced by explicit text or markup. The undefined template, for example, is a good one, because it makes chemical formula much easier type and read in the source, while providing essential layout -- the subscripts and superscripts that are semantically important in chemical formulas.  So is the °N, °W template, that adds a link to the map server without hogging up the source or the final page.  On the other hand, I just can't see what service  provides, to the editor or to the reader, that undefined does not already provide. Also more generally, "consistency" is a goal that Wikipedia cannot achieve, and in fact should not even try to achieve.  The useful contents of articles is created by volunteer editors who are not coordinated.  They cannot be expected to follow any style conventions that some other editor wrote up. Indeed, it would be a crime to ask them to waste their scarce and precious time in making articles look as if they had been produced by a team of tightly managed employees. Note that consitency   of looks or layout has absolutely zero value to the readers that Wikipedia was created to serve.  Instead, Wikipedia should be telling editors to ignore all style guides, and just make each article as useful and readable to those readers as possible, independently of any other articles. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 22:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikicode = HTML?
I have twice reverted your edits at Template:Infobox school/doc, and I have also reverted similar edits at two other template documentation pages. You marked example wikicode as HTML. Do you have some Wikipedia guideline or policy, or external source, showing that wikicode and HTML are equivalent? You have made similar edits here and in other template documentation, and the edits appear (to me) to be inconsistent and incorrect. What am I missing? – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * According to H:HTML, Wikitext is a subset of HTML. syntaxhighlight doesn't have "mediawiki" syntax, so I applied "html" to distinguish long HTML comments. -- Cedar101 (talk) 00:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm, go figure. I think I've seen people use "moin" in a few places, but marking wikicode as html seems bizarre to me. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It depends on what you want to highlight. In those templates, HTML comments is needed to highlight because they are longer than page widths. -- Cedar101 (talk) 05:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * We now have Pygments version 2.15, and it includes the Wikitext lexer, which provides  and   as valid values for the   attribute. The two appear to be synonymous. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * We now have Pygments version 2.15, and it includes the Wikitext lexer, which provides  and   as valid values for the   attribute. The two appear to be synonymous. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

July 2019
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Widefox ; talk 16:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

What is "Sass"?
In, you use the attribute  - what is "Sass" in this context? It seems to be unrelated to Sass (stylesheet language). Normally you seem to use. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * SASS is a kind of alternative CSS. It highlights the style specifications. -- Cedar101 (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, so you do mean Sass (stylesheet language). But why is that appropriate for an infobox template? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The style specification means * style(headerstyle, labelstyle, abovestyle, belowstyle and so on.) parameter values.  can't highlight it. 223.38.27.113 (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Source tag is deprecated
Some of your recent edits have resulted in articles being placed in. Please use  instead. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see.  is too long. I need shorter alternative. -- Cedar101 (talk) 01:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Merging
A reminder, from one experienced editor to another, to start a merge discussion when proposing merges. For example, you tagged typeof for merging back in July without adding a discussion, and it has languished for months with no comment or action. I've now closed it, as there was no case made and the justification for the merge, to my mind, isn't obvious. So, please make the case obvious for us non-subject-experts who might nevertheless be able to help with merging. The protocol for proposing merges is at WP:MERGEPROP. Klbrain (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Move of "GQL Graph Query Language" to "Graph Query Language" is wrong

 * I changed GQL from redirection to disambiguation page. Let's continue this discussion in Talk:GQL. -- Cedar101 (talk) 06:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Real Time Streaming Protocol
Hello. could you please fix your edit to Real Time Streaming Protocol? I don't think "state=== an ===" is what you really meant. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's my mistake. I fixed it. Cedar101 (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kripke–Platek set theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QED. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:Val
I noticed that you added Template:Val to several currency articles. May I ask why you did this? - ZLEA  T \ C 02:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I did this to consistently follow MOS:CURRENCY and MOS:NUM and to avoid wrapping between dollar symbols and values. -- Cedar101 (talk) 02:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think you should be a bit more careful when adding Template:Val and Template:US$. In this edit, you added the template within an image link. -  ZLEA  T \ C 14:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ITunes Store, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HDR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"ASDFGH" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ASDFGH&redirect=no ASDFGH] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at until a consensus is reached. An anonymous username, not my real name 23:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your changes to Boolean ring (math formatting)
I see that you recently made some formatting changes to Boolean ring (and other articles). To take an example, I agree with you that the previous version  that was rendering as x ∧ y = xy was not optimal. You changed it to, rendering as $x ∧ y = xy$, which is better. But notice how unwieldy the source code still is, with all these quote symbols in particular. Why not use, rendering as $$x \land y = xy$$? The result looks even better (notice the logical and symbol in particular), and easier to maintain, less error-prone in the source.

What do you think? PatrickR2 (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The use of is intended to minimize source changes, and if you think it's better to use, you can change that. -- Cedar101 (talk) 00:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * What you are doing is not very good. It's not worth the improvement in my opinion.  It's just busy work that someone will eventually have to redo, instead of a real improvement.  Better leave things as they are then until someone comes along and cares enough about a specific article to do it right.  My 2 cents. PatrickR2 (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I do not consider the amount of change to the source to be particularly important. Uniformity of format within an article at least seems to have general support.  I have learned that it is not worth caring about which of the three dominant variants of inline math formatting is used (x ∧ y = xy vs. $x ∧ y = xy$ vs. $$x \land y = xy$$), since each generates objections, and the debate is endless.  Saying "this looks better than that" does not mean much, since the rendering varies so much between browsers and with font choice.  In some contexts,  and  mess up spacing/wrapping/size/contrast/kerning.  Until WP gets its act together to get MathJax or similar working properly, a leave-it-be approach is often best.
 * The and  have the advantage that they can easily be exchanged through find-and-replace.  The same is not possible for /.  In any event, best not come to a conclusion in isolation: first discuss it at WT:WikiProject Mathematics.  A user talk page is not suitable for finding a consensus.  —Quondum

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Logic programming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commitment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dubeolsik-Hangul-Mac.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dubeolsik-Hangul-Mac.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)