User talk:Cehr1997/sandbox

Hannah's Peer Review
I was really impressed by the number of sources that you were able to find and cite within just those sections of your article for this page. The writing was clear, concise, and encyclopedic which is what is needed for this assignment. With having such concise sections it was easy for me to follow what was being said about the novel, even though I have never read it. The citations you provided throughout the article were helpful and accurate for those who wanted more information regarding that topic. The one aspect that I would suggest maybe looking into is your Source Nine. With this source, it was written by a Grade 11 student for a project and am just curious about the validity of the source since she published it for a final project. I also noted that she took the picture from Wikipedia and wonder if she used some of this all ready to put on her blog. This probably is okay, but I wasn't sure about it myself. If she were to already be using Wikipedia for her research, it doesn't seem reputable to use her work to put another section into Wikipedia if she based her research off of what was already on Wikipedia. With your tone being neutral and the writing being informational and encyclopedic, I feel that an improvement would be to add different links from your work to other works. For example, you could link the author's Wikipedia page if there is one. This would be helpful for readers to be able to learn more about the author and branch out to other aspects of this novel. I    Your article was informative and unbiased and easy to read. Being able to read this novel and the themes and seeing the receptions behind it is something that I hope to be able to accomplish within the next few days with my own writing in my article. All in all, good job! Hterry08 (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Kylie's Peer Review
Your article is well formatted, cited, and covers your chosen subjects pretty well. The only thing is that I feel like there might be more information or detail that you could add from your sources to expand a little on what you already have, if this can be done while maintaining the neutral tone; you have a lot of good sources. Nice job so far. KSterli2 18:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)