User talk:Celaycock

Fair use rationale for Image:Darwen outside.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Darwen outside.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mark Hennessey
A tag has been placed on Mark Hennessey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Olaf Davis | Talk 11:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Antonio Ally
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Antonio Ally, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.npg.org.uk/live/search/person.asp?LinkID=mp14470. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Antonia Ally for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonia Ally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antonia Ally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This should not affect nor interest you. The article was merged elsewhere, and the redirect was repurposed. Please ignore this message. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)