User talk:Celinanguyen/sandbox

Peer Review
Overall, I think you've made good improvements and additions to the article, especially in the "Traits" and "Criticisms of Eco-capitalism" sections. However, I feel that the tone of your criticisms section is not as neutral as it could be. While it does seem like you are trying to present it from a neutral point of view, some of the criticisms are structured in a way that makes it sound like they are being stated as facts.

Your sources also look to be reliable. Good work! Eric112358 (talk) 04:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Review
I appreciate the improvements you're making to the existing article. All of the new sections seem to be important to the topic, and now that I've seen them here, I definitely feel their absence in the article in the mainspace. I'm a little confused at the moment as to how the History section relates to the topic as a whole... could The Tragedy of the Commons be linked in the text to market-based measures that emerged afterward? As they exist, it seems like Traits and Approaches could be merged -- Traits seems to have a lot of info on eco-capitalist tactics. I agree that the criticisms seem to lean at the moment... maybe including links in this section to related articles would make it seem less like the article itself sustains these criticisms. Overall, the additions and modifications look to be very helpful.

Hoovern (talk) 06:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)