User talk:Cellurl

File copyright problem with File:Segments.png
Thank you for uploading File:Segments.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Zoo Fari  04:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Lynnwood_wa_cellurl.png
Thank you for uploading File:Lynnwood_wa_cellurl.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Stockholm cellurl.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stockholm cellurl.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Oakland2.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oakland2.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:Redteam.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Redteam.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 19:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Redteam.png
A tag has been placed on File:Redteam.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Segments.png
A tag has been placed on File:Segments.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 22:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Segments1.png
Thank you for uploading File:Segments1.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikispeedia
I left a query as to the notability of Wikispeedia on that articles talk page. I notice that you are the originator and a significant contributor to that article. Could you respond to the question - in particular to provide evidence, ideally independent 3rd party evidence as the scale and growth of this project so as to justify inclusion in Wikipedia. Many thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Cellurl/brittany (September 6)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 08:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Matt Selman
I'd try his Twitter. Gran2 22:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/brittany concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/brittany, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/brittany


Hello Cellurl. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "brittany".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm Gamaliel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from War on Women without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gamaliel ( talk ) 16:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wikispeedia


The article Wikispeedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Advertising a service according to WP:SPAM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 01:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)