User talk:Censusdata

Billy Gillispie article
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. SonPraises 02:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair-use image on user page
I haveremoved a non-free image from your user page. Please be advised that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Wikipedia policy does not allow templates (which includes userboxes) or user pages to contain any copyrighted content not under free license; so, for example, "fair use" images are explicitly forbidden. This clause is to be interpreted strictly and without exception, for legal reasons. You can research Wikipedia's fair use policy guidelines for more details.

For images and other media that are freely available for use in userpages and userboxes, check out Wikimedia Commons. Thanks. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Fuel economy reply
I'm not exactly sure, but I believe infoboxes have set fields; that there is a template somewhere with the current fields in it and that it can be modified to include fuel economy. I'd ask at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles, both to find out how it can be done and to see if other editors agree that it's a useful addition. IFCAR 14:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Trolling
Talk pages are for the discussion of articles. They are not a venue for you to air your personal opinions about Catholics. Please stop. IrishGuy talk 01:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Please don't make me warn you again. Stop trolling. IrishGuy talk 01:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Timothy
Sometimes, it is important to assume that the Church is wiser than we are. Gavin Scott 09:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

As I said, we must assume that they are wiser than we are. Ofcourse, we know they are. Gavin Scott 16:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply to user:Seicer
Your edit, to a featured article, did not have a reliable source and citation.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
It is my belief after a long time of theological study and church history that the RMC is the one true church- it is the supreme branch there is no doubt, they even constructed the bible. However, I believe that God cares about the content of your character opposed to what Church you go to. Worship him and no other and you shall be saved. However, your prayers mean more to me than you could possibly know. Gavin Scott 21:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Super Regionals
Check the NCAA record book here: http://www.ncaa.org/library/records/baseball/baseball_champs_records/2006/d1/2006_d1_baseball_champ_records.pdf. It's the 2006 version. Super Regionals started in 1999 so you'll just have to manually check every year since then. I don't know of any sites where one could easily glean that type of information. College baseball isn't as thoroughly covered as some other sports, unfortunately. Seancp 00:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

re
Regarding the redirect I restored (New Testament Church), it's not my page and if you feel it warrants it's own article fine, remember be bold! However, that doesn't mean you can rant on my talk page and make frivolous accusations of vandalism. Have a quick read of this WP:CIVIL while you calm down.--The internet is serious business 20:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

See Talk page on Council (sic) of Jerusalem.Roger Arguile 14:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Info about Louisville places template
I just wanted to let you know that the template also has northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast parameters if you need them. Stevie is the man! Talk &bull; Work 16:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

reference syntax
Please be careful about using correct reference syntax. One of your recent edits ended up pulling half a paragraph into a reference which made the article quite confusing :) Kaldari 22:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

More personal attacks and trolling
Please stop. Continued behavior like this will likely result in a block. See edit summaries here, here, and here. --Sable232 17:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Advice to Angry Aspie: It's best to keep personal stuff out of edit disputes. But if you feel you're correct, keep arguing on the merits, but in the article's talk -- remember WP:3RR.  Stevie is the man!  Talk &bull; Work 20:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano
A template has been added to the article Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. hbdragon88 01:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. hbdragon88 05:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Tundra
There is no reason whatsoever for the head image to be the latest one. None of the available images of 2007 models are especially good, so they do not belong there. Do not revert. IFCAR 13:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Kentucky public university ACT scores graphic
I was looking at the graphic you posted featuring median ACT scores for Kentucky's state universities, and noticed a mistake that needs fixing. You have "NKU" listed twice. The gold bar is correct. The green bar needs "KSU", as it represents Kentucky State University. Thanks... :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Your pictures
I like some of your pictures. Do you remember where you took Image:Picture 1281.jpg was taken. I'd love to use it on the Kentucky portal. Thanks.-- Bedford 06:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

In a similar vein, when you were taking pictures in Portland, did you happen to take one of the Portland Museum? I've thought about starting the article, and if you've already taken a photo, I don't need to take more. Thanks.-- Bedford 16:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Wind gusts in tornadoes
They have never been included in articles (per a 2006 mention:)

http://www.srh.weather.gov/jetstream/mesoscale/tornado.htm "The F-scale is to be used with great caution. Tornado wind speeds are still largely unknown; and the wind speeds on the F-scale have never been scientifically tested and proven. Different winds may be needed to cause the same damage depending on how well-built a structure is, wind direction, wind duration, battering by flying debris, and a bunch of other factors."

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/#f-scale1 "Tornado wind speeds are still largely unknown; and the wind speeds on the original F-scale have never been scientifically tested and proven. Different winds may be needed to cause the same damage depending on how well-built a structure is, wind direction, wind duration, battering by flying debris, and a bunch of other factors. Also, the process of rating the damage itself is largely a judgment call -- quite inconsistent and arbitrary (Doswell and Burgess, 1988). Even meteorologists and engineers highly experienced in damage survey techniques often came up with different F-scale ratings for the same damage."

"So if the original F-scale winds are just guesses, why are they so specific? Excellent question. Those winds were arbitrarily attached to the damage scale based on 12-step mathematical interpolation between the hurricane criteria of the Beaufort wind scale, and the threshold for Mach 1 (738 mph). Though the F-scale actually peaks at F12 (Mach 1), only F1 through F5 are used in practice, with F0 attached for tornadoes of winds weaker than hurricane force. Again, F-scale wind-to-damage relationships are untested, unknown and purely hypothetical. They have never been proven and may not represent real tornadoes. F-scale winds should not be taken literally."

No doubt wonderful sources. However, there was nothing hypothetical or debatable about the extent and size of the destruction in Xenia. It was F-5 (or EF-5), one mile wide through the heart of a city, any way you look at it. It took a diesel locomotive--one quarter of a million pounds--lifted it up and turned it over. That is no myth--I saw it with my own eyes.--Buckboard 22:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

CrazyC83 (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:36410923 e5c1ac3302 o.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:36410923 e5c1ac3302 o.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of New Testament Church
An article that you have been involved in editing, New Testament Church, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/New Testament Church. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? John Carter (talk) 01:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Louisville murder rates
Hi, do you have references for recent years' murder rates for Louisville, Kentucky? I was thinking you were the one who added that data in the first place, so you may remember where you got the data from. Thanks! Stevie is the man! Talk &bull; Work 23:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:I-015_nb_080_wb_exit_305b_02.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:I-015_nb_080_wb_exit_305b_02.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Louisville Cardinals
Why have you removed a bunch of content and messed up a bunch of section headers (twice)? I've reverted you again, if you want to redo your edits please explain them with an edit summary or on a talk page. Oren0 (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skycrest, Lexington
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Skycrest, Lexington, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable location

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 14:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:8489746.jpg
File:8489746.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:HumanaBuilding1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

NCAA vacated games
FYI. The NCAA record books show all coaches and games in the record book, but with an asterisk. For example, see the Coaches Final Four Records. It was decided by the College Basketball Project that we should reflect the same contents as the NCAA record books. Thus, your edits amount to vandalism of an established article. If you dislike the way things are done, please bring it up on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball rather than creating an edit war. Ryan2845 (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Stop!
Make sure you're not being caught by a malicious rumor being spread by someone impersonating a reporter on twitter. See the talk page for more details, but do NOT put in that he died without a reputable, verifiable source. SirFozzie (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Lexington photo request
Hi, I see you've taken and uploaded many photos of places in and around Lexington, KY. Do you take requests? I'd like to add a photo of a building on the north side of the city, near I-75 and Newtown Pike, to an article. However I can't find any free version.  Will Beback   talk    20:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Super. The building is at 1537 Bull Lea Road, Lexington, KY 40511. It's "Peace Palace", viewed probably from their parking lot. It's less than a mile off of I-75, so if you go that way it shouldn't be much of a detour. There's no rush, whenever it's convenient (and if it's never convenient I can ask someone else). Cheers,    Will Beback    talk    01:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DarkhanMong4byTavernier7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DarkhanMong4byTavernier7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:46, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DarkhanMong3byTavernier7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DarkhanMong3byTavernier7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DarkhanMong2byTavernier7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DarkhanMong2byTavernier7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DarkhanMong1byTavernier7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DarkhanMong1byTavernier7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict6.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict6.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PJCSbySportsAddict.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PJCSbySportsAddict.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  20:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HarrodsHillLexMap.gif
A tag has been placed on File:HarrodsHillLexMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CardinalValleyLexMap.gif
A tag has been placed on File:CardinalValleyLexMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GardensideLexMap.gif
A tag has been placed on File:GardensideLexMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GardenSpringsLexMap.gif
A tag has been placed on File:GardenSpringsLexMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BeaumontCentreLexMap.gif
A tag has been placed on File:BeaumontCentreLexMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rosemill, Lexington


The article Rosemill, Lexington has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCopter RadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 02:18, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Invitation
I've noticed your excellent work on Kentucky related articles, especially on the neighborhoods of Lexington, and wanted to invite you to join the Eastern Mountain Coal Fields task force. J654567 (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Picture 1250.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 1250.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Also File:Picture 565.jpg and File:Picture 1223.jpg. —Bkell (talk) 01:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Also File:Picture 1532.jpg. —Bkell (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Picture 1957.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 1957.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 13:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Also File:Picture 876.jpg and File:Picture 1998.jpg . —Bkell (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bill Dovell Motor Car Company for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Bill Dovell Motor Car Company, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bill Dovell Motor Car Company until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Paradise Fossil Plant
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paradise Fossil Plant, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Paradise_Fossil_Plant.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

New articles
Your articles on power stations are a welcome addition. Please remember to maintain proper formatting and layout for section headings. You can find more information here. Rather than adding an "External sources" section, simply add an inline link, then the citation will be placed in the References section. Thanks, Cindamuse (talk) 18:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Formatting of new articles
Thanks for adding all of the new articles. Please do a google search to find the official names, and please be sure to use proper formatting for new articles. For examples, please refer to WP:MOS for details. Ng.j (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Please be careful when creating new articles. I know it is really easy to just cut and paste from an older article, but I have found several times that you pasted the wrong name and website. If you want other editors to respect your work you must take more care in the future.Ng.j (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LouLoop.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LouLoop.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LouAmpit.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LouAmpit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of University of Louisville Residence Halls


The article University of Louisville Residence Halls has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ost (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

And thank you as well...
...for the kind words. Inferno,  Lord of   Penguins  20:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Image0245EmersonCenterGSLex.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Image0245EmersonCenterGSLex.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:4thbelgr.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4thbelgr.jpg, which you've sourced to (book cover. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.}  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Woodward Heights, Lexington
Just wanted to invite you to help with the Woodward Heights, Lexington article. I know you've been active in creating neighborhood articles, and there's a lot to write about this one (NRHP district, incorporating several individual NRHP properties). cmadler (talk) 12:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bushmurallou1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bushmurallou1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Multichill (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Toyota 4Runner and Sequoia sales figures.
Thank you for your recent edits to the sales figures at Toyota 4Runner and Toyota Sequoia. Unfortunately you have removed the references for the 2000 onwards figures and replaced them with a blanket reference that only covers the 2010 and 2011 calendar years. A blanket reference (ie at the top of the column) also has the problem that it is not future proof - ie when the 2012 calendar year figures are known your reference won't cover it but it gives the false appearance that it does.

Could you restore the previous references on their individual figures and then add your new references to the individual figures that need them? Thanks.  Stepho  talk 23:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Picture 1690.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 1690.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Picture 1689.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 1689.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Picture 1663.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 1663.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Picture 1664.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 1664.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:1863 Mansion, Portland, Lousville.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:02, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:A church building on 6th Street-Limerick,Lousiville.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Narrow Road in Kentucky
Can anybody provide information about the exact location of this picture (i.e. what county or town)? Instead of being a useful member of society I like to see what is the first picture in articles on countries or U.S. states and where exactly they are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.253.48.157 (talk) 13:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Albany, Indiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgetown, Indiana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited May 1927 tornado outbreak, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Centerville, Illinois, Kingston, Arkansas and Eden, Illinois. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (April 1945 tornado outbreak) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating April 1945 tornado outbreak, Censusdata!

Wikipedia editor RileyBugz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice job on your articles, but it would be nice if you could add a Wikiproject on the talk page when you do. Thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on RileyBugz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  23:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited April 1919 tornado outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Grove, Texas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Change to page
Hi User:Censusdata, just wondered can you make an edit to Maiorana page please? That the name is Norman French in origin, on page 326 of this source Della Calabria illustrata the book states that the fleur-de-lis in the coat of arms of the family also indicates a Norman origin. I just don't do edits on that scale, because more than likely no one will edit the page for many months, leaving my mistakes (that become Wikipedia's mistakes) on show. You'd just have to blank the page then change categories to Norman and "Maiorana is an Italian surname" to "Maiorana is a Norman French surname" (Good examples of Norman names are Banister (surname) and Molyneux). Hope you can help, thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Lynn Family Stadium moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lynn Family Stadium, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lynn Family Stadium concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lynn Family Stadium, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)