User talk:CentipedeBrows

May 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mullah Omar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 21:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Tartan, seemingly, you believe democracy is overrated. You labeling the edits as "unconstructive" and as "vandalism" is per definition subjective in the extreme. Moreover, it seems that you would like to bow down to the whim of what can only be described as de-facto terrorists. I quote
 * "The current picture is the one the Taliban have chosen to use. The one you are suggesting is also of pretty poor quality, so I would prefer not to change it. It has typically been Wikipedia practice to go with an image preferred by the subject when one is available."
 * You are quite literally, in your own words, siding with the Taliban? @Khestwol props to you for calling @Tartan357 out on this. I will share it on various other sites such as Reddit as well. Let's see if we can call Wikipedia out on this. It's absurd that they're covering for the Taliban and even legitimizing them. CentipedeBrows (talk) 22:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Blanking the infobox for no reason is vandalism, and I stand behind that. Don't do that. Also, do not falsely accuse me of supporting the Taliban. That is a personal attack that will get you blocked if you repeat it again. ― Tartan357  Talk 22:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I will make the exact same edits with sources once again, because everything written was factually correct. I look forward to hearing from you then. CentipedeBrows (talk) 22:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Abdul Qahar Balkhi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ― Tartan357  Talk 21:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I quite literally wrote in my edit comment that the comments I made were an extension of citations used! And per Wiki customs, I didn't cite the same source twice. I'm an academic of pretty high stature, so I know how to make proper edits in accordance with APA 7 guidelines. Please change it back, or address my edit comment. I very clearly fleshed out on the article by New Zealand's largest news media, Stuff! CentipedeBrows (talk) 22:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This edit added content without a source. ― Tartan357  Talk 22:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello @Tartan357 I noticed that even my new edits are being removes on the Taliban representative's page. How so? No one is commenting on it, but removing it without notice despite me listening to your feedback... CentipedeBrows (talk) 23:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Abdul Qahar Balkhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE💕 22:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Okay. Just to clarify, I do not intend to continue revering, and I only edited it because no one commented on my edits, but simply removed them at a whim. CentipedeBrows (talk) 22:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
― Tartan357  Talk 21:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello @Tartan357. I have responded to your allegations on the noticeboard. Feel free to comment CentipedeBrows (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Vandalism, personal attacks, off-wiki threat from User:CentipedeBrows. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 22:12, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello @Tartan357. I have responded to your allegations on the noticeboard. Feel free to comment. CentipedeBrows (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 00:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * This demonstrates a lack of understanding of why you were blocked. You were not blocked for changing the picture in that article (which was a copyright violation when you did it, BTW), you were blocked for threatening to WP:BRIGADE, accusing editors of supporting the Taliban, and making non-neutral edits to Taliban biographies (and edit-warring over them), even during the ANI discussion. That said, for any reviewing admin, I think a topic ban from the Taliban would be sufficient to address the issue (and disruptive edits were made between the Afghan DS warning and the block). There are people who feel too strongly about the Taliban to be able to jump right in on that topic in a productive way as a new user, but could be productive in other areas. ― Tartan357  Talk 02:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)