User talk:Central Tank Battery

February 2022
As far as I can see, your editing so far has been as follows. Firstly, there has been editing, mainly on this page but now deleted, in which you have been using Wikipedia as a web host to post extensive material for your own use, unrelated to work for the encyclopaedia. Secondly, there have been posts to articles, in which to some extent you look as though you may be trying to indicate problems you have seen with the articles, but you don't yet have enough grasp of how Wikipedia works to know how to use the relevant facilities properly. Thirdly, there have been edits where you have posted personal opinions or comments into articles, which you shouldn't do. Fourthly, there are edits which really don't make much sense at all, so that it's difficult to know what you were trying to do, and in some cases it looks rather like vandalism. There may be others, as I haven't checked every one of the 129 edits you have made, but I have checked a wide enough sample to make me confident that the overall picture is correct. Unfortunately, for various reasons none of those is helpful editing.

Here is some advice which I hope may help you to learn how to contribute constructively.
 * A Wikipedia talk page is for messages and discussions about work for the encyclopaedia, and a Wikipedia user page is for someone who is active in working for the project to give a little information about himself or herself in connection with his or her work for the encyclopaedia. Don't use them for material unrelated to those purposes; if you do, you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator before long.
 * Start out by making small simple improvements to articles, using plain text to change article content. Leave anything using templates until you have much more experience of how editing Wikipedia works, so you will have a better idea how to do things. JBW (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, JB. I am internet and will upload all pertinent materials, again. And then again, could future circumstances require. Appreciate your thoughts and prayers on my journey to erect must-truth. GFY.
 * Central Tank Battery (talk) 05:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I put some time into writing the above message to try to help you, because I assumed you were acting in good faith. Since then your vandalism to my talk page has put that assumption into doubt. If you continue to edit in unconstructive ways you will be blocked from editing by an administrator. I have no idea whatsoever what you mean by "I am internet". Add your signature to posts in talk pages, but not in articles. JBW (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Further investigation of your editing shows that much of what you have done, while superficially looking plausible, is in fact nonsense. To give just one example, in this edit you wrote "Recent data from the Hi-C sounding rocket strongly discourages this explanation of threaded loops", despite the fact that the text where you posted that doesn't mention anything to do with threaded loops. This and similar examples make me wonder whether you may be just copying fragments from other places and posting them randomly into articles. However, whatever the reason that you have been posting such irrelevant content into articles, please don't do it. JBW (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Do scandals associated with '-gate' mean anything to anyone? Because there's a 'sea-' of one, in particular, that I will discuss. Quit trying to prop up Bitcoin with your wikipedia page; confusion is not constructive. Confucius states this in his coming out {of the womb} address.  Central Tank Battery (talk) 21:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:49, 2 March 2022 (UTC)