User talk:Centrodejusticia

License tagging for Image:Pobreza nica ninos.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pobreza nica ninos.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centro de Justicia concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centro de Justicia, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centro de Justicia


Hello Centrodejusticia. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Centro de Justicia".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KevinCieply.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KevinCieply.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centro de Justicia concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centro de Justicia, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Centro de Justicia


Hello Centrodejusticia. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Centro de Justicia".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2018
Please stop adding Ulysses Jaen to the Naples, FL article as a notable person until his notability is established. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

three advanced degrees and a career full of grateful WVU students as per close to 50 personal recommendations on Linkedin, several newspaper and TV articles, Law Review notes, conferences, organizations and boards. Notability is not in question, just google the alum and stop abusing your discretion, please. Leave the information posted for wiki readers to learn the fact that he is a notable graduate of the WVU College of Law. Are you?
 * Degrees don't make one notable. Grateful students don't either. Nor do Linkedin recommendations, conferences etc. Perhaps you should read WP:NPROF or even WP:N. Clearly, you've never taken the time to read what Wikipedia considers notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DeanCieply.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:DeanCieply.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
The picture of Kevin Cieply has been deleted at least twice. Stop circumventing the deletion results by uploading the same material again and again. Also, engage in discussion on the talk page and don't throw around allegations of vandalism just because you don't like an edit. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Your reasoning is faulty at best and must be based on some sense of empowerment in being malicious against particular contributions. You are disruptive and waste everyone's time with your personal vendettas against the institution. The picture of the leader of the institution is relevant and important! The people have the right to see it and he has the right to show it. You are not the King of Wikipedia so please, please stop and go find someone else to vandalize.
 * I actually love the school. It's a beautiful campus and I've attended some sports events there. None of that has to do with the edits I've made. First of all, I'd think that someone editing on behalf of a law school would be more aware of copyright law. Second, You keep talking about the "leader", yet have been posting 3 pictures. It's not our normal practice to show every dean that the school has, much like we don't list every VP of a corporation. Third, you've had two experienced editors remove the content now. In addition, you've restored deleted content. I'd strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with the common practices here and engage in some discussion instead of edit warring and making ad hominem attacks. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Centrodejusticia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 17:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ave Maria School of Law shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 18:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to circumvent our policies per this warning, insulting people who attempt to explain the problem, and disruptive editing at Ave Maria School of Law, including offensive and absurd edit summaries.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)