User talk:Ceparlib

Welcome!
Hello, Ceparlib, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Ceparlib, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! –Ammarpad (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ceparlib


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Ceparlib, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. –Ammarpad (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 02:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Email received from user:
 * "New to the Wikipedia community...
 * Just logged in after a few days( I was actually thinking about deleting the username CePARLib and spelling out the actual name of the Think Tank).
 * I read your explanation as to why the page was "deleted." I disagree a 1,000% Not being aware of something does not automatically = it being a spam. I will be more than happy to provide some clarity on the subject.
 * I am not a "spammer," I am a real person trying to set up the page for the first Think Tank in Africa oldest republic. We are not a corporation to profit off having a Wikipedia page.
 * The world is a global village, as such...there will be lots of folks around the world trying to bring awareness to issues critical to folks in their geographical location via using encyclopedia knowledge(Wiki)as a reference source on both domestic and foreign policy matters our leaders usually claim is done in our interests. Every developed nation (and most developing nations) have Think Tanks on Wikipedia explaining what they represent and stand for, as a means of providing information on many subjects to folks in their part of the world; why not Liberia?
 * The world is a global village, as such...there will be lots of folks around the world trying to bring awareness to issues critical to folks in their geographical location via using encyclopedia knowledge(Wiki)as a reference source on both domestic and foreign policy matters our leaders usually claim is done in our interests. Every developed nation (and most developing nations) have Think Tanks on Wikipedia explaining what they represent and stand for, as a means of providing information on many subjects to folks in their part of the world; why not Liberia?


 * This is a critical time on Liberia's history. We are a new generation. We do not desire using a gun as reference for knowledge in the global village. What may appear as "spam," is something very serious to folks in Liberia.
 * ''Folks look to The Center for Policy Action and Research as a means of keeping whatever government is there; honest!
 * The organization is known in Liberia but Liberians are not only limited to Liberia. We recently performed the analysis of the fraudulent (EBOMAF SA) loan that was rush through the Senate and we are the only group to do an analysis of the yearly raft national budgets. We are NOT paid to do ANY of these services. We perform these services because knowledge and education is very critical to avoiding future conflicts in Liberia.
 * If you guys remove a knowledge based source where Liberians/folks from around the world can come to read and see a balanced analysis of issues critical to Liberia; what other avenues are there?
 * I would be more than happy to email you a copy of those documents for your perusal.
 * I would also appreciate your assistance in setting up the page within the guidelines of the Wikipedia community."
 * I would be more than happy to email you a copy of those documents for your perusal.
 * I would also appreciate your assistance in setting up the page within the guidelines of the Wikipedia community."

Thanks for your message but email should only be used for private information that should not be revealed publicly. Every other Wikipedia communication goes in Talk pages and should be a matter of public record. That said, let's answer your lengthy message in parts:

"Just logged in after a few days( I was actually thinking about deleting the username CePARLib and spelling out the actual name of the Think Tank)."
 * That would be a violation of the username rules.

''I read your explanation as to why the page was "deleted." I disagree a 1,000% Not being aware of something does not automatically = it being a spam. I will be more than happy to provide some clarity on the subject.'' ''I am not a "spammer," I am a real person trying to set up the page for the first Think Tank in Africa oldest republic. We are not a corporation to profit off having a Wikipedia page.''
 * You were not blocked for being a spammer but for violating username rules as said above. Having a profit motive or not is irrelevant here.

''The world is a global village, as such...there will be lots of folks around the world trying to bring awareness to issues critical to folks in their geographical location via using encyclopedia knowledge(Wiki)as a reference source on both domestic and foreign policy matters our leaders usually claim is done in our interests. Every developed nation (and most developing nations) have Think Tanks on Wikipedia explaining what they represent and stand for, as a means of providing information on many subjects to folks in their part of the world; why not Liberia?''
 * Please read the explanation about noble causes, however important they may be.

We are a new generation. We do not desire using a gun as reference for knowledge in the global village. What may appear as "spam," is something very serious to folks in Liberia.'' :''Folks look to The Center for Policy Action and Research as a means of keeping whatever government is there; honest! :''The organization is known in Liberia but Liberians are not only limited to Liberia. We recently performed the analysis of the fraudulent (EBOMAF SA) loan that was rush through the Senate and we are the only group to do an analysis of the yearly raft national budgets. We are NOT paid to do ANY of these services. We perform these services because knowledge and education is very critical to avoiding future conflicts in Liberia.''
 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. As such does not take sides in Liberia's political matters or on any issue.

If you guys remove a knowledge based source where Liberians/folks from around the world can come to read and see a balanced analysis of issues critical to Liberia; what other avenues are there? There are many Social Media places to post your views, such as your own website, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and many more. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia.

I would be more than happy to email you a copy of those documents for your perusal.
 * Emails are not the preferred venue as mentioned above. All conversations must be public unless there are private issues to be kept away from the public.

I would also appreciate your assistance in setting up the page within the guidelines of the Wikipedia community."
 * For starters you should read the help pages and Articles for creation. The best place too ask questions about how Wikipedia works is at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 16:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)