User talk:CeraPhi1

Welcome!
Hello, CeraPhi1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:CeraPhi1/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CeraPhi1/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:CeraPhi1/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Salvio 14:53, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * I completely understand the reason for blocking my account. I would like to continue generating a page on geothermal energy as well as giving the time line and history of CeraPhi, if this is possible, I appreciate the formatting needs to be correct on this platform, as an encyclopaedia. This is all very new to me, therefore your advice will be greatly received. CeraPhi1 (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * To be unblocked, I suggest you post an unblock request, using this template: . The first thing you need to do is choose a different username, one that represents only you as an individual. If you want, you can choose a username referencing CeraPhi, as long as the username represents only you, such as "John Doe at CeraPhi". Regardless of the username you choose, however, you are expected to abide by WP:COI, our rules on conflicts of interest, and to avoid using Wikipedia for promotion (per WP:PROMO). If you are paid to edit, you must disclose it as well. What it boils down to, basically, is that edits about geothermal energy are welcome in general, but writing about CeraPhi is strongly discouraged.  Salvio 15:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this. Do I post the unblock request here or elsewhere? CeraPhi1 (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Can I also ask, BP have a wikipedia page. Is there something about their format that allows this, something I can learn from? CeraPhi1 (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You can post the unblock request here, so that it can be reviewed; in it, as I said, you should indicate you new username and the edits you intend to make if unblocked. Regarding why BP has an article while CeraPhi doesn't, I have to admit that I'm not familiar enough with CeraPhi to know whether it is notable enough to qualify for inclusion. Basically, to qualify for inclusion, an organisation (or anything else, really) must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If for CeraPhi that's the case, you can request an article. It's going to take a while, but it's a way to ensure that our articles are neutral and not promotional... Salvio 16:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Great, thank you so much for your help. CeraPhi1 (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)