User talk:Ceradon/Archive 5

Problems with upload of File:William Lindsay Brandon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:William Lindsay Brandon.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request Cerabot II
Someone has marked Bots/Requests for approval/Cerabot II as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place  anywhere on this page.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Yo m8, happy holidays

 Royal Mate1  06:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC) 
 * Damn, thank you. :D You've made my day. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 08:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/2014 Glasgow bin lorry crash
PatGallacher created the article; I was just nominating and editing the article. --George Ho (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the note. It has been corrected. -ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 22:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Whitney_Stevens_%282nd_nomination%29
Why on earth did you relist this? Spartaz Humbug! 09:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

AfD
Hi Ceradon!

You seem to have jumped into AfD pretty heavily in the last couple of days. Which is good! AfD could use all the attention it can with the massive amount of nominations per day. However, you seem to be trying to get involved in quasi-administrative tasks such as relisting and closing debates, which isn't so great given your inexperience. If you don't mind, I'll try to give you some pointers in the most respectful way possible, and then ask that you refrain from the admin tasks until you've built up some more solid experience at AfD by restricting yourself to !voting.

First, per WP:REDIRECT, a debate generally shouldn't be relisted more than twice without good reason and accompanied by a relisting statement (i.e. relisting to raise consensus on a redirect/merge target after rough consensus is established to do so, or because an editor has recently found a bunch of new sources on the subject.) A discussion with little-to-no discussion after two relistings should generally be closed as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination; this is to keep AfD from getting bogged-down with low-traffic month-old discussions. You should also not !vote on AfDs that you either have relisted or will relist. As you are WP:INVOLVED in the debate, you are no longer a neutral party and therefore incapable of carrying out a relist without introducing bias. Although this should go without saying, this should especially apply to closing debates (even though you technically didn't execute the deletion, you are still involved and should let a completely uninvolved party complete the process.) Per WP:BADNAC, Non-admin closure is not appropriate in any of the following situations: (1) The non-admin has demonstrated a potential conflict of interest, or lack of impartiality, by having expressed an opinion in the discussion or being otherwise involved, with the exception of closing their own withdrawn nomination as a speedy keep when all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well.

On a related note, you should generally not try to close AfDs unless an obvious consensus has been achieved and you have the technical ability to do so yourself, meaning closing as delete. (The latter is currently being debated but still very contentious.) An administrator closing discussions is a matter of judgement about a rough consensus in the discussion. As a non-admin, you don't have that trust vested in you by the community; thus, you shouldn't make any closures where judgement and evaluation of consensus is required. Per WP:NAD, Extra care should be taken if a closure may be controversial or not clearly unambiguous. With the understanding that the closure may be reversed, non-admins should generally avoid closing such discussions.

Finally, and I mean this respectfully, you just don't have the experience at AfD to be able to close discussions knowledgeably. For example, you don't seem to entirely understand the requirements to speedy keep, including your own nominations. Of your twelve delete !votes on closed discussions, only half of them closed as such. All of these things, combined with your lack of understanding of closing guidelines, illustrates that you are new to AfD, and inexperienced.

None of these are bad things! The only way to gain experience at AfD is to !vote at AfD and view plenty of deletion discussions. However, I really hope you agree that relisting and closing discussions isn't for you yet. I'm not trying to condescend whatsoever, but those are roles that are better left to admins and experienced AfD editors. I really hope you stick around AfD, but your best area of productivity right now would be in participating in discussions, not maintaining and closing them.

Please read the pages I've linked you, and let me know if you have any questions. Best,  09:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have undone some of your closes and deleted some of your relists. I'm afraid you are not ready to be closing deletion discussions and your relists are too eager. Perhaps you can just participate for a while until you get more experience. Spartaz Humbug! 10:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * and : Fair enough. (Although, I have taken a liking to deletion sorting, though. Simple enough to understand; I can see that being a problem.) I shouldn't have jumped in so quickly and so heavily, this I understand. Admittedly, though, I don't even remember listing Articles for deletion/List of Hawaiian composers. It was likely a Twinkle misclick. Nevertheless, I'll familiarize myself with protocols established before relisting any debates, and refrain entirely from non-admin closures. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 10:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Must have been one hell of a misclick. Anyways, delsorting is fine, even in discussions you !vote in; all delsorting is is bringing a discussion to the attention of editors with a specific interest. If it makes you happy, go for it. Thanks for understanding, hope to keep seeing you around AfD!  10:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Cerabot double Dating
This edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chabad_messianism&oldid=640217716&diffonly=1&diff=prev

Cerabot added a 2nd "date" parameter after the (capitalized) "Date" parameter.

Wouldn't it be simpler to just change "D" to "d"? 172.164.53.78 (talk) 10:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Thank you for pointing that out. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 10:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Cetabot error detecting creator of article
Cerabot appears to have made an error detecting the creator of an article that was subsequently renamed. Details. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Cerabot presumptions
Cerabot presumed that I created Floyd Smith (doctor), while I just moved it. The creator is EtienneDolet.--The Theosophist (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

T:TDYK notices
Re: It is not helpful for DYK to know who the original page creator is on a 5x expansion, since the DYK nomination only concerns the 5x expander. The original page creator is never notified of the DYK nomination, only the 5x expander. If the latter editor is blocked, the DYK reviewer will spot that pretty quickly. Yoninah (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Afternoon
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Armenia–Azerbaijan relations in the Eurovision Song Contest
 * I've decided to withdraw the bot task entirely. It just doesn't seem like a useful thing to be doing and I could see it being particularly contentious. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 14:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Since your bot is not approved for this task, please revert this edits of your bot. Thank you.  Jim Car ter  15:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The bot was in trial, for the record. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 15:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You haven't reverted those edits yet. Look at this for example. Since you have withdrawn the request for Bot approval hence it the task is unapproved, so I think you should go ahead and undo edits that are unhelpful. Cheers,  Jim Car ter  15:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The edits made were made with clear consensus by the community. I withdrew my request because I thought it would be controversial. There is still another bot that will do the exact same task Cerabot did. Reverting these edits for another bot to simply re-do them is unnecessary to say the least. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 16:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I appreciate that you're trying to help out but I don't think there was a requirement to notify editors on the DYK nomination. When I read a nomination I don't need to consider who it credits, so those notices just end up being spammy as I try to review. notifies user talkpages without tagging the nomination template.


 * On another issue, the bot seems to be notifying the original article creators rather than those named on the nomination template. If you go through the original bot request, it asks for a notification system based on the Template:DYKmake - not the article history. So we now have random editors showing up confused, having created forgotten redirects or pages moves months ago but otherwise unaffiliated with the article.


 * Would it be possible to undo those edits? Fuebaey (talk) 18:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Why are these notices even being made? My DYK nom was also flagged, and there is absolutely no reason to notify the person who created the article 6 years ago. Anyway, I completely rewrote the article. I'm really confused. – Maky  « talk » 18:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll try my best to undo the edits made by the bot. I came to the same realization myself: these edits wouldn't be useful. A note should be left at the other bot's BRFA about this as well. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 18:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Edits to DYK pages have been reverted. Edits mistakenly added to User talk pages have also been reverted. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 19:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Ceradon for undoing them. 19:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim Carter (talk • contribs)
 * Thank you from me, too, for reverting it. Yoninah (talk) 22:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Curve-billed Thrasher- bug report?
I'm not sure if this is deliberate, but the bot notified me as a page creator despite the fact that I just moved the page- the article had existed for a while at a title with alternative capitalisation (as is now common in bird articles). J Milburn (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was a malfunction. The bot has been disabled indefinitely and the BRFA withdrawn. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 18:22, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Dr. Floyd Smith
On Template:Did you know nominations/Dr. Floyd Smith, the was not created by The Theosophist, it was merely moved to a new name. Can I remove that comment? Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure. The bot malfunctioned. -ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 20:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!
 Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I've been apart of MilHist for a while now. Just kinda went inactive for quite a while. Regardless, thank you for the (re)introduction. Wink.png --ceradon  ( talk  •  contribs ) 22:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Belarus
Hi Ceradon, I would like to further discuss with you this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lucatelospiega#top Thank you in advance Lucatelospiega (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

double parameters
Your userpage has double parameters: edit rate and status. You might want to correct that. Via: CAT:DUPARG. -DePiep (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I just kinda redid my userpage. Hope it was fixed. If not, please leave another not because I'm not seeing a edit rate or status param. Ctrl+F isn't either. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 23:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The bot's userpage! Didn't notice that the talkpage was redirected here ;-). -DePiep (talk) 23:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * btw, did not receive the ping, saw this in my watchlist. -DePiep (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, thank you for pointing that out Smile.png. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 00:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (report)  @ 20:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No thank you. Thanks for the offer though. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 22:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Malvern Hill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Malvern Hill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!
I just wanted to thank you for your courteous response at Template:Did you know nominations/The customer is not a moron. Sometimes it seems like people around here just want to fight, so it's refreshing that, rather than arguing, you said my concerns were reasonable. M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  07:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem! I see no problem with labeling reasonable concerns as such. Thanks, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 22:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Saltbush Bill's Gamecock, Ceradon.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"I have removed one unsourced and IMO, unencyclopedic section."

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
 * No problem. But I've added another citation needed tag for the first line. That would still need a source. Thanks for notifying me though, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 09:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Malvern Hill
The article Battle of Malvern Hill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Malvern Hill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, everyday is a learning experience. Closed it. I admit I got that wrong. Thank you for pointing that out. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 22:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

The comment at the AFD earlier today
Hi, I don't want to start any sort of argument with you, and of course you are correct that there are many possible factors for them not contributing any further. But I would just like to clarify a point in case we come across each other again. I said that I thought the swearing was unnecessary "in the circumstances". I know that wikipedia is not censored, and I am ceratinly not troubled by swearing myself. I just thought it was a bit unwarranted towards a new user. Now, if you had told someone to "fuck off" after they stuck their nose into an issue that was already a couple of weeks cold, I would totally support you on that. :) Finally, I hope that you can see the amusement in this happening on a page concerning a television show called "Total Drama". AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for USS Delaware vs La Croyable
Thanks for helping free speech Victuallers (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Labuan/GA1
Hi Ceradon, as a friendly reminder, you claimed this GAN over a week ago. Will you be able to review it in the next few days? Nick-D (talk) 10:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder. I'll probably get around to it very soon. Cheers, --ceradon  ( talk  •  contribs ) 15:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that Nick-D (talk) 07:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Dumas Brothel review
I have a few initial comments at Talk:Dumas Brothel/GA1. I'm not formally putting it on hold for now, see if you can clean up the informalities and awkward constructions, and maybe I can put together a short sourceable description of the building.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Top Totty DYK
Why did you put Top Totty into the DYK queues today. IT was being held in the April Fools Day area for that day and shouldn't be running before that.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 23:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * An oversight on my part. You're welcome to revert. I'm a bit busy (and mighty focused) researching shit for an article expansion (started here if you care Smile.png). Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 23:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Ceradon, I'm trying to figure out how you could even have seen Top Totty. The nomination template had been moved to the April Fools Day page (and deleted on the main DYK nominations page) back on January 18. If you're looking on any page other than T:TDYK for hooks to build preps, you really shouldn't be. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I did stay on T:TDYK. Was looking at Mary Brodric entry and haphazardly clicked the QPQ link to check if the QPQ was done and thought "wow, Top Totty would be pretty cool to promote" and subsequently went frolicking to T:DYK/P1. Entirely missed the April Fools day comment. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, let's put it another way: if you're get to the nomination page via the QPQ or some other non-standard method, instead of viewing it directly on the T:TDYK page from a transclusion there, it's important that you reconfirm that the transcluded nomination can still be seen directly on T:TDYK before promoting it. That way this problem won't recur with any special occasion hooks, be they April Fools or just ordinary holds. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 03:23, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Huggle message
Hey Ceradon! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers

I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/

Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.

Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 09:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Malvern Hill
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William L. Brandon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William L. Brandon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William L. Brandon
The article William L. Brandon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William L. Brandon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William L. Brandon
The article William L. Brandon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William L. Brandon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * So I've heard. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 22:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

RfC - Helper Script access
An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to  comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Brad Craddock
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

21:23:34, 3 February 2015 review of submission by 198.184.147.19
Thank you for your review. We made corrections based on the feedback of the first reviewer by adding several more secondary reliable sources to the manuscript. We were disappointed to now get different reasons for a rejection, even though we made merely minimal changes to the text between the first and second submission. Can you be more specific what you mean by "reads more like an advertisement" (I read the hyperlink and the NPOV)? There is no attempt to sell anything on this page, we point out the notability of Joseph Maroon based on his athletic and neurosurgical career. Joseph Maroon's name has even been published on the Wikipedia page of the National Fitness Hall of Fame, which so far is an empty link. Any specific feedback on what you find inappropriate in the language is much appreciated.198.184.147.19 (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

198.184.147.19 (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia, first of all,


 * Here are some pointers I'd like to give you on the article:
 * Wikipedia has a very strict policy on articles on living people (as they might contest or object to the content of their articles). Therefore everything must be cited. You must provide a reference the information in the Maroon article and you should only put information in the article that is provided by an independent, neutral source that a reasonable person would deem reliable. This is a must. Additionally, articles can only state what's in the source.
 * State the facts and let the reader develop their own opinion about whether or not he's an expert. Instead of saying: "John Smith is an expert in the field of sports medicine," say, "John Smith has worked extensively in the field of sports medicine for fourteen years, having published 500 papers on various topics related to the area, more than half of which has been cited in peer-reviewed journals and other medical literature." The latter will have more of an effect on the reader. Outright telling them he's an expert does nothing to educate Wikipedia's readers, but telling them why he might be considered an expert increases the credibility of the article.
 * You must give equal weight to all sides of an argument, or, in this case, all viewpoints of a person. Focusing on the good and giving only passing mentions to the bad doesn't work. Nobody's perfect. Trying to portray someone as Mother Teresa when they're not will hurt or destroy the credibility of your article in the eyes of the reader.
 * Articles must not be written like an autobiography. Present the facts, not conjecture or speculation. You seem to have a close connection to Maroon (you said "we" several times and the creator of the draft bears the name of Maroon as their screen name). There is nothing inherently wrong with that (but you should declare it as a potential conflict of interest). However, as I stated above, you must must, must, must remain neutral. We are here to write facts and give all viewpoints of a topic, not opine and speculate, especially not on the biography of a living person.
 * I hope this helps. I'd also like to say this: don't worry about making mistakes. We all do. However, intransigence, an unwillingness to change you viewpoints or consider others, is the easiest way to being shoved off into the abyss of irrelevance in this community. Nevertheless, be bold and break things. You'll learn quicker this way. My talk page is always open. Knock on my door any time you like. I'd be happy to help you. All the best with editing and I hope to see you around very soon. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 06:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

BridgeCity album proposed deletion
The album BridgeCity is proposed for deletion.

However, I request it be considered to remove this proposed deletion by yourself. The album has been reviewed by a professional review site (New Release Tuesday) and its release was given coverage by a few professional music sites (like Jesus Freak Hideout). I've seen plenty of articles much worse off than this, with less coverage and sources to boot, yet they aren't being threatened.

RhettGedies (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Got into an edit conflict with you trying to remove the PROD template. Either way, I've nominated the article for deletion. You're welcome to comment there. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 08:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

FAC note
Sorry, I have a couple of reviews going at the moment and won't be able to reply to your responses at the Malvern Hill FAC till tomorrow. I hope to go through the whole article again then. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * no problem. Cheers, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Seemi Zaidi
Yeah I thought about putting a copyright notice up for Seemi Zaidi but since it was so short I was not sure if it qualified so I put a AFD up (which you can comment as a speedy if you like) Wgolf (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dumas Brothel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dumas Brothel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 04:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I haven't forgotten the GA review: major house renovation work has consumed evenings and weekends, I'll try to find an hour or two to re-review and to see if I can maybe add an architectural description.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The National Register nomination for the Butte-Anaconda Historic District is available here . It's 449 pages, so I'm working through it to see if it describes the Dumas. It mentions the red-light district as part of the central business district.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It doesn't, it's just listed as a contributing structure (p. 124 of the appendix, listed as 41 E. Mercury). It does mention the underground connections.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * damn... I'll see what I can dig up as well and reply back if I find anything. Thank you, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The Dumas is briefly mentioned on p. 27 in several paragraphs, mentioning examples of other houses.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Just throwing this out there: http://www.thedumasbrothel.com/ It's barely secondary but if you cut through the marketing speak, you can quote it verbatim in a quote box in the Background section. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I was hoping to add something along the lines of "the brothel is a two-story brick structure with a raised basement. The first and second floors are pierced by a large light well or atrium, surrounded by balconies ..." All of this is eminently true, but it's based on my personal observation, and is not citeable in a Good Article. The website can't support such a detailed description.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * https://books.google.bs/books?id=wfGPEX0PA3wC&pg=PA228&dq=dumas+brothel+balcony&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tbPeVMnnFsmXNrPugogI&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=dumas%20brothel%20balcony&f=false Check that out. I think that should do it. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've added a brief description and moved the first ref up to that paragraph. I don't think we'll get much better than that until someone publishes a detailed investigation.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll return to the article this weekend for a last review, but not tonight - it's been a long week.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm
The article Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on WP:AN
Hello! You have been selected to receive an invitation to participate in the closure review for the recent RfC regarding the AfC Helper script. You've been chosen because you participated in the original RfC. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. This message is automated. Replies will not be noticed. -- QEDK ♠  T  ♥  C  14:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dumas Brothel
The article Dumas Brothel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dumas Brothel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Sorry it took so long !  Acroterion   (talk)   02:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Jerry Lester
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)