User talk:CerealKillerYum

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomas Gorny has been accepted
 Tomas Gorny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 15:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Tomas_Gorny help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

October 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Adelaide Central Plaza. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Precision Group, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It is unclear where the personal attack was. Please clarify. Did I ever say that I attacked you? We need proof of such a thing for the warning to be valid. CerealKillerYum (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Right, let's go to ANI then. Shall we? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Advanced Bionics
I have been working on an article for advanced bionics one of the child companies of Sonova Group. Noticed your note on the Sonova talk page. I submitted the article before but someone thought it was not significant, what do you think? I think Advanced Bionics merits it's own article. Should I submit it?PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Tomas Gorny for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomas Gorny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tomas Gorny& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Shower head.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shower head.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

A Quiet Word
Hi - just wanted to drop a quiet word that your most recent comments to Vix sapentia in the Jordan Harbinger AfD came across as rather bitey in my view. You may well be right regarding the COI issues, but if he isn't being overtly hostile or vandal-esk then it seems counter-productive (and no doubt a whole bunch of wikijargon) Nosebagbear (talk) 09:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 09:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Fresh grass, 2014.jpg


The page File:Fresh grass, 2014.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Shore City Shopping Centre NZ.jpg


The page File:Shore City Shopping Centre NZ.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)